aedifion GmbH is a Cologne-based PropTech founded in 2017 that operates a vendor-neutral, patented cloud platform for the optimized operation of non-residential buildings. The platform ingests real-time operating data from all building trades via plug-and-play edge devices, applies analytics and AI to detect faults and inefficiencies, and autonomously controls HVAC and building services based on weather forecasts, occupancy and electricity prices - cutting energy use, CO2 emissions and operating costs by up to 40% without structural retrofits. Products span aedifion.io (connectivity and monitoring), aedifion.analytics, aedifion.controls, aedifion.dynamics (demand-side management) and aedifion.smartkit. Developers get a documented HTTP API (OpenAPI 3.0, 208 operations across projects, datapoints, timeseries, analytics, controls, alerts and tasks), an MQTT broker and a Kafka interface for streaming building telemetry. The company serves owners, operators and asset managers of commercial real estate and supports decarbonization, ESG reporting and DGNB, ISO 50001 and GEG certification.
Aedifion publishes 14 API contracts indexed on the APIs.io network, including MQTT API, AI API, Alert API, and 11 more. Tagged areas include Building Automation, Smart Buildings, Energy Management, IoT, and Real Estate.
The Aedifion catalog on APIs.io includes 2 event-driven AsyncAPI specifications and 1 Spectral governance ruleset.
Aedifion’s developer surface includes pricing, documentation, API reference, getting-started guide, support, engineering blog, signup flow, and 35 more developer resources.
Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the
Energy & Utilities regime, so
Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite.
If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your
provider repo — the
applicability map is public and we will correct it.
Create-or-Update Ergonomics applies to this provider. This API accepts writes, so it
carries 10 points of the composite. It is scored from the published contracts
themselves: whether a caller can create-or-update in one call, whether the write accepts a key the caller already
holds, and whether the response says which branch ran. Without that, every write needs a search-and-branch in
front of it, and the first time that check is skipped a duplicate record is created.
Scored against the observed mean rather than raw — a provider at the catalog average is unchanged by this facet,
not penalised by it.
The six quality facets above are damped to 75 points between them,
because the conditional facet above carries the other
25. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped
maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 75% of its nominal
weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.
Show this score on your site.
It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:
<a href="https://apis.io/providers/aedifion/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/aedifion/card.svg" alt="Aedifion on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>
Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.
Raise your score.
Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):
MCP Server+12 pts — deployment.mode + probe verdict on the mcp/ manifest, not the pointer; an unprobed slug falls back to authorship
A2A Agent Card+8 pts — a2a/-a2a.yml manifest, graded on conformance.grade against A2A 1.0.0
Documented Reversibility+6 pts — a reversal operation in the contract, graded up when a window is documented too
Pagination+5 pts — share of collection GETs (an array, or one wrapped in data/items/results ...) that declare a page/limit/offset/cursor parameter, a Link header or a next/cursor field; na with no collection GETs
Protected Resource Metadata+5 pts — a served /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource carrying `resource` (documented), and naming its authorization_servers (verified)
3 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.
Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):
Access Clarityscores 42.1 — up to +11.6 composite points
The Kin Score Market layer reads a provider inside its market:
its position, and how deep its integrations go. Depth is only comparable within a position. Provisional and unweighted:
not part of the Kin Score or agent readiness.
Registered MCP server and declares compatibility are report only — not weighted.
Undeclared means we found nothing we can read, so there is no number: we never infer integrations.
Standards this provider implements or carries. De facto ones are profiled and measured by the API Commons; formal ones come from the standards directory and are linked by the provider's own tags. The evidence column says how each claim was established — not that it was made.
MQTT 3.1.1 broker interface at mqtt.aedifion.io for streaming building telemetry into and out of the aedifion.io platform. TLS-only (ports 8883 for native MQTT, 9001 for MQTT ov...
Event-driven interface to the aedifion.io building operations platform. The broker carries three topic families - building timeseries observations, semantic metadata, and contro...
Overlays applied on top of this provider's contracts. Each card says who wrote it: a document the provider publishes, or one API Evangelist derived or generated.
Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.
Get an API key
Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we
store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another
provider. See our Privacy Policy and
Terms.
Kin Score
How this is scored →
It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs: