PropTech
Property TechnologyPropTech
Providers using this tag (312)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 39 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 103 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 129 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
313 providers carry this tag directly, and 313 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 290 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged PropTech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 26.6 | 26.5 | +0.1 | 290 |
| Discoverability | 57.2 | 58.1 | -0.9 | 290 |
| Contract Governance | 3.8 | 6.3 | -2.5 | 290 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.6 | 13.7 | -4.1 | 290 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.3 | 23.2 | -4.9 | 290 |
| Contract Quality | 11.6 | 17.6 | -6 | 290 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 14% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 14% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Zillapi 63.8
- 2 Lev 63
- 3 Aedifion 62.5
- 4 Goodlord 55.8
- 5 Yardi Canada 55.7
- 6 Alasco 54.9
- 7 Spark Platform 54.7
- 8 Snappt 54.2
- 9 Ordnance Survey 53.9
- 10 Street.co.uk 53.6
- 1 Zillapi 59.5
- 2 Aptly 56.3
- 3 Lev 54.5
- 4 VergeSense 53.8
- 5 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 6 Alasco 48.7
- 7 Aedifion 47.8
- 8 Landing 46.9
- 9 Yardi Canada 46.7
- 10 PEXA 46.6
Coverage caveat. 282 of 290 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.