Valuation
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Valuation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 45 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Valuation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 32.8 | 19.8 | +13 | 45 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.9 | 23.4 | +7.5 | 45 |
| Discoverability | 67.5 | 61.2 | +6.3 | 45 |
| Access Clarity | 32.2 | 26.5 | +5.7 | 45 |
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.4 | +2.1 | 45 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.6 | 14 | +1.6 | 45 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 10% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Zillapi 61.7
- 2 Street.co.uk 54
- 3 73 Strings 52.7
- 4 Lone Wolf Technologies 51.4
- 5 Landmark Information Group 51.2
- 6 Domain Group 48
- 7 Estated 47.2
- 8 Hometrack 43.8
- 9 ARGUS Enterprise 42.3
- 10 Zillow Group 41.3
- 1 Zillapi 59.5
- 2 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 3 Landmark Information Group 45.9
- 4 Domain Group 43.3
- 5 Landgate 39
- 6 Hometrack 38.7
- 7 Connells Group 33.1
- 8 73 Strings 31.5
- 9 Estated 31
- 10 Street.co.uk 30.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.