Valuation
Valuationvaluation
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (30)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Valuation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.6 | 17.5 | +16.1 | 54 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.6 | 17.9 | +11.7 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 70.9 | 60.4 | +10.5 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 31.5 | 22.3 | +9.2 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.4 | +5.9 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.3 | 11.3 | +5 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 44% | 16% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 9% | +15 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 13% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Factset 64.8
- 2 Zillapi 63.8
- 3 HM Land Registry 58.5
- 4 Street.co.uk 55.4
- 5 Lone Wolf Technologies 53.5
- 6 VaultRE 52.8
- 7 73 Strings 52.6
- 8 Landmark Information Group 52.5
- 9 Landgate 49.9
- 10 Domain Group 48.2
- 1 Zillapi 58.3
- 2 Factset 52.8
- 3 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 4 Landmark Information Group 42.6
- 5 Domain Group 41.5
- 6 Landgate 39
- 7 HM Land Registry 38.7
- 8 Hometrack 38.7
- 9 Solera 33.6
- 10 VaultRE 33.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/valuation"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/valuation"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/valuation/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.