Property Data
Property DataPropertyData
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (36)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Property Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Property Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.2 | 19.8 | +16.4 | 54 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.3 | 23.4 | +9.9 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 34.8 | 26.5 | +8.3 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 67.3 | 61.2 | +6.1 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 10.6 | 6.4 | +4.2 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.1 | 14 | +4.1 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 10% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Zillapi 61.7
- 2 CoreLogic (Cotality) 59.5
- 3 Ordnance Survey 57.9
- 4 Bridge 56.9
- 5 Landmark Information Group 51.2
- 6 ATTOM 50.9
- 7 REA Group 49
- 8 Domain Group 48
- 9 First American Financial 47.9
- 10 HOVER 47.6
- 1 Zillapi 59.5
- 2 Landmark Information Group 45.9
- 3 Domain Group 43.3
- 4 Alto (Vebra / Zoopla) 41.8
- 5 Landgate 39
- 6 Hometrack 38.7
- 7 Microburbs 38.4
- 8 HOVER 33.8
- 9 First American Financial 33.2
- 10 Ordnance Survey 31.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.