Real Estate
Providers using this tag (616)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 65 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 65 Limited public surface area
Emerging 200 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 272 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Real Estate” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
616 providers carry this tag directly, and 687 counting the 15 narrower tags below and the 3 beneath them — 71 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 566 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Real Estate, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 25.5 | 26.5 | -1 | 566 |
| Discoverability | 56.4 | 58.1 | -1.7 | 566 |
| Contract Governance | 4.2 | 6.3 | -2.1 | 566 |
| Operational Transparency | 9 | 13.7 | -4.7 | 566 |
| Contract Quality | 11.5 | 17.6 | -6.1 | 566 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17 | 23.2 | -6.2 | 566 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 12% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 14% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 SignSealShip Partner API 66.5
- 2 Zillapi 63.8
- 3 Lev 63
- 4 Aedifion 62.5
- 5 Mlsgrid 62.4
- 6 flatin.pt 59.4
- 7 ReefAPI 57.7
- 8 First Street 56.5
- 9 Accruent 56
- 10 Goodlord 55.8
- 1 Zillapi 59.5
- 2 Cobot 58
- 3 Aptly 56.3
- 4 Beyond 55.9
- 5 Lev 54.5
- 6 Facilio 51.6
- 7 Move Home Organisation CIC 51.3
- 8 Cubby 51.3
- 9 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 10 Alasco 48.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.