Real Estate
Providers using this tag (824)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 31 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 81 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 95 Limited public surface area
Emerging 314 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 299 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (86)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 40 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Real Estate” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
824 providers carry this tag directly, and 917 counting the 15 narrower tags below and the 4 beneath them — 93 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Real Estate and Proptech | 92% |
| REITs and Real Estate Securities (SEC REIT registrants, EPRA) | 75% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 731 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Real Estate, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.9 | 30 | -0.1 | 731 |
| Discoverability | 57.6 | 59.1 | -1.5 | 731 |
| Contract Governance | 7.4 | 9.7 | -2.3 | 731 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.8 | 13.2 | -4.4 | 731 |
| Contract Quality | 13.2 | 18.6 | -5.4 | 731 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.7 | 24.5 | -5.8 | 731 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 18% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 16% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 36% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Common Elements 68.1
- 2 Zillapi 67.9
- 3 Lev 66.6
- 4 SignSealShip Partner API 65.4
- 5 Snappt 64.3
- 6 MRI Software 62.6
- 7 Notarize 62.4
- 8 Mlsgrid 61.9
- 9 propraven-com 61.5
- 10 ReefAPI 60.7
- 1 Bucky 65.5
- 2 propraven-com 61.1
- 3 Cobot 58.6
- 4 Zillapi 58.3
- 5 Casatoo 57.2
- 6 Hostfully 56.3
- 7 Lev 55.3
- 8 Cubi Estate 54.5
- 9 Aptly 52.9
- 10 Facilio 52.5
Coverage caveat. 655 of 731 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.