Property Management
Providers using this tag (154)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 46 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (24)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Property Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 147 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Property Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.6 | 26.5 | +4.1 | 147 |
| Discoverability | 58.2 | 58.1 | +0.1 | 147 |
| Contract Quality | 16.5 | 17.6 | -1.1 | 147 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.5 | 13.7 | -1.2 | 147 |
| Contract Governance | 4 | 6.3 | -2.3 | 147 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.1 | 23.2 | -3.1 | 147 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 12% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 73.4
- 2 Mews 60.1
- 3 Goodlord 55.8
- 4 Yardi Canada 55.7
- 5 Snappt 54.2
- 6 Street.co.uk 53.6
- 7 Findigs 52.9
- 8 Hostaway 51
- 9 RentCheck 50.3
- 10 VaultRE 50.3
- 1 Aptly 56.3
- 2 Cubby 51.3
- 3 Akia 47.1
- 4 Yardi Canada 46.7
- 5 Hospitable 44.6
- 6 apaleo 44.6
- 7 Uplisting 44.6
- 8 AlterEstate 41.9
- 9 Alto (Vebra / Zoopla) 41.8
- 10 Fixflo 41.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.