Property Management
Providers using this tag (153)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 60 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Property Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 145 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Property Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.5 | 26.5 | +5 | 145 |
| Discoverability | 61.1 | 61.2 | -0.1 | 145 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.8 | 13.9 | -0.1 | 145 |
| Contract Quality | 19.2 | 19.8 | -0.6 | 145 |
| Contract Governance | 4.4 | 6.4 | -2 | 145 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.9 | 23.4 | -2.5 | 145 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 69.3
- 2 Mews 61.5
- 3 Goodlord 60.7
- 4 Yardi Canada 60.1
- 5 Mews 59.8
- 6 Reapit 57.9
- 7 Findigs 56.4
- 8 Street.co.uk 54
- 9 Snappt 53
- 10 Hostaway 50.5
- 1 Cubby 51.3
- 2 Akia 47.1
- 3 Yardi Canada 46.7
- 4 Reapit 46.6
- 5 AlterEstate 44.1
- 6 Fixflo 43.6
- 7 Alto (Vebra / Zoopla) 41.8
- 8 Holidu 40.8
- 9 Beyond Pricing 40.5
- 10 Aptly 40.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.