Property
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (23)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Property” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Property, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 56.6 | 61.2 | -4.6 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 21.3 | 26.5 | -5.2 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 0.9 | 6.4 | -5.5 | 25 |
| Contract Quality | 8.7 | 19.8 | -11.1 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 1.6 | 14 | -12.4 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10.8 | 23.4 | -12.6 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 92% | 97% | -5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 14% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Canopy Connect 71
- 2 Land Insight 45.9
- 3 LightBox Zoning API 26.9
- 4 Liberty Mutual Insurance 21.4
- 5 Risklytics 19.8
- 6 REalyse 18
- 7 Lamudi 14
- 8 Baania 12.8
- 9 Shweproperty 12.8
- 10 London House Exchange (Property Partner) 11.9
- 1 Canopy Connect 42.6
- 2 Land Insight 27.2
- 3 LightBox Zoning API 19.8
- 4 Liberty Mutual Insurance 17.3
- 5 REalyse 8.6
- 6 Lamudi 2.9
- 7 Risklytics 2.5
- 8 UrbanMetry 2.2
- 9 Baania 0
- 10 Shweproperty 0
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.