niche · 0.1 market industry

Property

Score 17.7 / 100 49 providers +30 via APIs 33 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Real Estate Brokerage Management 6 Data & Reference Information Services 1 Travel Product & Inventory Management 1 Property Management Operations 1 Insurance Underwriting Management 1

Providers using this tag (49)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 22 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (33)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (30)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Property” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

2s Alasco Arthur Online Assurant ATTOM Avnet BIM.HOUSE Bridge Interactive Casa Intelligence CoreLogic (Cotality) CREA (REALTOR.ca) Defense Logistics Agency Estated Expedia Group Factanker Fixflo Helicone Landcor Data Mlsgrid Moody's Perchwell Purplebricks REALTOR.ca Reonomy Rightmove SponsorUnited Sprift swathapi-com Tandoor Recipes Verisk

Score breakdown

Frequency
51.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
16.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
7.8
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Real Estate broader

Related tags

Property Data 10 co-occurrences Property Listings 9 co-occurrences Real Estate 56 co-occurrences PropTech 24 co-occurrences OpenHouse 5 co-occurrences Office 6 co-occurrences RESO 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag31
Provider tag49
Openapi tag19
Openapi op tag76

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Property, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
43
of 49 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
17.7
-6.4 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
10
-4.1 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
2.6–69.3
median 12.3 · σ 16.5
How the 43 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 0Developing 4Thin 4Emerging 16Minimal 18
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 27.3 30 -2.7 43
Discoverability 56.3 59.1 -2.8 43
Contract Governance 5.4 9.7 -4.3 43
Contract Quality 11 18.6 -7.6 43
Operational Transparency 5.3 13.2 -7.9 43
Developer Ergonomics 16.5 24.5 -8 43

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 16% 18% -2
MCP server (first-party) 14% 16% -2
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 12% 13% -1
Security 98% 99% -1
Arazzo workflows 0% 1% -1
Governance rules 23% 36% -13

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

All 49 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 43 carry a score (88%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 37 of 43 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/property"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.