Smart Buildings
Smart BuildingSmart Buildings
Providers using this tag (34)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Smart Buildings, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 30 | 23.2 | +6.8 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 61.8 | 58.1 | +3.7 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.3 | +2.4 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 16 | 13.7 | +2.3 | 32 |
| Contract Quality | 18.6 | 17.6 | +1 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 22.1 | 26.5 | -4.4 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 12% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Aedifion 62.5
- 2 Siemens 53.7
- 3 VergeSense 51.7
- 4 Leap 45.6
- 5 Butlr 45.3
- 6 Door 40.7
- 7 75F 39.9
- 8 PassiveLogic 36.8
- 9 BRICK Schema 36.5
- 10 Verdigris Technologies 36.5
- 1 VergeSense 53.8
- 2 Aedifion 47.8
- 3 Siemens 38.2
- 4 Door 36.5
- 5 PassiveLogic 35.1
- 6 Verdigris Technologies 34.4
- 7 Openpath 31
- 8 Delos 30.8
- 9 Leap 28.2
- 10 BRICK Schema 26.8
Coverage caveat. 31 of 32 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.