Building Automation
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Carrier Comfort NetworkCarrier Comfort Network (CCN) is Carrier's proprietary control and communication network for tying together...Carrier i-Vu Building Automationi-Vu is Carrier's web-based commercial building automation system for monitoring and controlling HVAC, ligh...75F Haystack API75F's Project Haystack-compliant external REST API. Reads Haystack entity records by filter or by id (read)...75F Special Schedules APIA v2 REST API for exception-based ("special") schedules applied at building or zone level — create, update ...
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Tracer SC+ Building Automation SystemTracer SC+ is Trane's commercial building automation system controller. It is built on open, industry-stand...Trane ConnectTrane Connect is the secure, cloud-based customer portal that lets building owners and service technicians ...Trane Developer PortalPartner-facing developer portal hosted at developer.devops.chvac.trane.com for Trane Commercial HVAC ("CHVA...
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
EcoStruxure Facility Expert Data APIAPI providing time series data and alarms access for buildings and equipment monitored by EcoStruxure Facil...Otis Integrated Dispatch (OID) APICloud-based or on-premise API for integrating service robots and third-party applications with Otis elevato...Infinitum Selection Tools APIAn HTTP/JSON API over Infinitum's Motor Selection Tool (MST) and Fan Selection Tool (FST), documented by In...Honeywell ForgeHoneywell Forge is the connected enterprise platform that provides developer integration capabilities for b...
Score breakdown
Frequency
42.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
27.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Smart Buildings 13 co-occurrences
HVAC 10 co-occurrences
Energy Management 8 co-occurrences
Internet of Things 6 co-occurrences
IoT 13 co-occurrences
Sustainability 10 co-occurrences
Energy 6 co-occurrences
Manufacturing 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag26
Api tag11
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Building Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
26
all scored
Mean Kin Score
24.6
+0.8 vs catalog 23.8
Mean Agent Readiness
13.1
+1.5 vs catalog 11.6
Spread
3.3–52.5
median 25.4 · σ 14.2
How the 26 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 6Thin 6Emerging 8Minimal 6
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.3 | +3.3 | 26 |
| Discoverability | 63.5 | 61 | +2.5 | 26 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.7 | 23.3 | +2.4 | 26 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.2 | 13.9 | -0.7 | 26 |
| Contract Quality | 18.6 | 19.8 | -1.2 | 26 |
| Access Clarity | 22.2 | 26.3 | -4.1 | 26 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 9% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 11% | +16 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Carrier Global 52.5
- 2 75F 43
- 3 ButterflyMX 41.3
- 4 PassiveLogic 40.8
- 5 Door 40.5
- 6 Verdigris Technologies 40.4
- 7 Siemens 35.2
- 8 Hello Therma 35.1
- 9 Delos 33.6
- 10 Turntide Technologies 33
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Turntide Technologies 44.4
- 2 Carrier Global 41.5
- 3 PassiveLogic 37.2
- 4 ButterflyMX 36.9
- 5 Verdigris Technologies 36.9
- 6 Door 36.5
- 7 Delos 32.9
- 8 Siemens 19.8
- 9 GridPoint 17.6
- 10 Hello Therma 11.4
All 26 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of
9 September 2026, across 27528
providers, using the same computation served by the
APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of
5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.