Building Automation
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
aedifion MQTT APIMQTT 3.1.1 broker interface at mqtt.aedifion.io for streaming building telemetry into and out of the aedifi...Carrier Comfort NetworkCarrier Comfort Network (CCN) is Carrier's proprietary control and communication network for tying together...Carrier i-Vu Building Automationi-Vu is Carrier's web-based commercial building automation system for monitoring and controlling HVAC, ligh...
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Tracer SC+ Building Automation SystemTracer SC+ is Trane's commercial building automation system controller. It is built on open, industry-stand...Trane ConnectTrane Connect is the secure, cloud-based customer portal that lets building owners and service technicians ...Trane Developer PortalPartner-facing developer portal hosted at developer.devops.chvac.trane.com for Trane Commercial HVAC ("CHVA...Otis Integrated Dispatch (OID) APICloud-based or on-premise API for integrating service robots and third-party applications with Otis elevato...
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
EcoStruxure Facility Expert Data APIAPI providing time series data and alarms access for buildings and equipment monitored by EcoStruxure Facil...Infinitum Selection Tools APIAn HTTP/JSON API over Infinitum's Motor Selection Tool (MST) and Fan Selection Tool (FST), documented by In...Honeywell ForgeHoneywell Forge is the connected enterprise platform that provides developer integration capabilities for b...
Score breakdown
Frequency
43.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
30.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
4.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Smart Buildings 15 co-occurrences
HVAC 11 co-occurrences
Energy Management 9 co-occurrences
IoT 19 co-occurrences
Sustainability 11 co-occurrences
PropTech 6 co-occurrences
Energy 6 co-occurrences
Manufacturing 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag27
Api tag12
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Building Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
27
all scored
Mean Kin Score
25.1
+2.2 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
15.1
+3.2 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.5–62.5
median 25.8 · σ 16.7
How the 27 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 2Developing 4Thin 7Emerging 7Minimal 7
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.6 | 23.2 | +4.4 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 61 | 58.1 | +2.9 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 8.9 | 6.3 | +2.6 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.2 | 13.7 | +2.5 | 27 |
| Contract Quality | 18.4 | 17.6 | +0.8 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 24.3 | 26.5 | -2.2 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Aedifion 62.5
- 2 Carrier Global 54.5
- 3 Siemens 53.7
- 4 ButterflyMX 42.8
- 5 Door 40.7
- 6 75F 39.9
- 7 PassiveLogic 36.8
- 8 Verdigris Technologies 36.5
- 9 Delos 33.5
- 10 Hello Therma 32.2
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Aedifion 47.8
- 2 Carrier Global 41.5
- 3 Siemens 38.2
- 4 Door 36.5
- 5 PassiveLogic 35.1
- 6 ButterflyMX 34.7
- 7 Verdigris Technologies 34.4
- 8 Turntide Technologies 32.9
- 9 Hello Therma 32.7
- 10 Delos 30.8
All 27 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 24 of 27 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 24 of 27 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.