Energy
Providers using this tag (688)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 75 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 75 Limited public surface area
Emerging 166 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 328 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (99)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (12)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Energy” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 638 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Energy, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.3 | 6.4 | -1.1 | 638 |
| Discoverability | 58.6 | 61.2 | -2.6 | 638 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.9 | 14 | -4.1 | 638 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17.5 | 23.4 | -5.9 | 638 |
| Contract Quality | 13.2 | 19.8 | -6.6 | 638 |
| Access Clarity | 19.9 | 26.5 | -6.6 | 638 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 10% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 13% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Enphase Energy 68.6
- 2 Braiins 68.2
- 3 Eliq 67.7
- 4 EDF Energy 66.5
- 5 UK Power Networks 66
- 6 Xoserve 64.2
- 7 Electricity North West 64
- 8 IFS 62.9
- 9 CMS Energy 62.2
- 10 Tesla Energy 61.7
- 1 Xpansiv 56.6
- 2 ev.energy 53.3
- 3 Aerones 48.4
- 4 Amber Electric 47.7
- 5 Southwest Power Pool 43.3
- 6 Hydro-Québec 43.1
- 7 Southern California Edison 42.7
- 8 Eliq 41.2
- 9 AEMO 40.8
- 10 Origin Energy 40.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.