ENERGY STAR Certified Products (appliances, electronics, data-center equipment, EV chargers, smart thermostats)
Register + standard market (energy star product certification; connected-device subset flagged per category). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- data.energystar.gov Socrata catalog (api/views/metadata/v1) machine-readable, 90 datasets; used to resolve current dataset ids; Developer Resources me9a-5y43 403; brief's j7nq-iepp 403 / not in catalog
- ENERGY STAR Model Index (data.energystar.gov/resource/8wj2-sec8) machine-readable, all currently certified models: 2,826 partner x brand x category rows, 1,198 partners, 47 categories; name only; 35 linked in-market, 16 out-of-market / held
- ENERGY STAR per-category datasets, connected-functionality fields (18 datasets incl. Smart Thermostats 7p2p-wkbf, EVSE AC/DC, heat pumps, water heaters, refrigerators) machine-readable, 8,910 connected models, 262 partners; 251 models not joinable to a partner
- ENERGY STAR Connected Light Bulbs / Connected Light Fixtures (msj5-kqfv, 5tzz-d4ju) machine-readable, stale (last updated 2025-01/02; none of their models in the current index): not read as connected
- energystar.gov/productfinder/ machine-readable, 200; human cross-check only, same data
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 58 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | IoT 36%, Consumer Electronics 28%, Energy 21% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | IoT 53%, Hardware 26%, Energy 22% |
| Industries | IoT & Connected Devices 48%, Semiconductors & Hardware 40%, Technology 24%, Industrial 22%, Energy 21% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | 68.5 | 161 | 125 / 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | partner-built 85%, contract 1%, standard 9%, builds-on-platform 5% |
covered 5 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Octopus Energy | 47.9 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 40%, covered 60% |
| Devialet | 37.7 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 50% |
| Rokid | 36.1 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 50% |
| Govee | 22.2 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 67%, covered 33% |
| 1KOMMA5° | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
standard 39 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 70.6 | 60 | 0 / 60 | 0 | 6 | 0 | contract 6%, standard 49%, builds-on-platform 34%, distribution 11% |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 62.8 | 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 | 4 | 0 | standard 56%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 15% |
| Nutanix | 61.7 | 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | contract 8%, standard 56%, builds-on-platform 28%, distribution 8% |
| Lenovo | 61.2 | 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 86%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 7% |
| Enphase Energy | 59.5 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 25%, standard 50%, covered 25% |
| Lennox International | 58.5 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 75%, builds-on-platform 25% |
| Super Micro Computer | 58.3 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Zebra Technologies | 58.2 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 80%, builds-on-platform 20% |
| EcoFlow | 58.1 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 17%, standard 67%, covered 17% |
| Sony | 57.1 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 91%, builds-on-platform 9% |
| NetApp | 56.8 | 22 | 0 / 22 | 0 | 3 | 0 | contract 9%, standard 45%, builds-on-platform 32%, distribution 14% |
| Tesla | 55.8 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 9%, standard 64%, covered 27% |
| Honeywell | 55.6 | 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 | 4 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 7%, standard 60%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 27% |
| Rivian Automotive | 55.6 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 33%, builds-on-platform 17% |
| Eaton | 55.2 | 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 83%, covered 8%, builds-on-platform 8% |
| EnergyHub | 54.9 | 33 | 0 / 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| HP | 54.8 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 80%, builds-on-platform 20% |
| ChargePoint | 54.5 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 67%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 17% |
| Carrier Global | 54.3 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 78%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 11% |
| Vertiv | 54.3 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Extreme Networks | 54.1 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 89%, builds-on-platform 11% |
| Schneider Electric Exchange | 54.1 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 86%, distribution 14% |
| Ubiquiti | 53.6 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 80%, builds-on-platform 20% |
| Pure Storage | 53.1 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 55%, builds-on-platform 27%, distribution 18% |
| Johnson Controls | 52.9 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 89%, distribution 11% |
| Roku | 52.0 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 25%, atp-outside 25% |
| Xerox | 51.0 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | contract 20%, standard 60%, distribution 20% |
| Lexmark International | 50.4 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 86%, distribution 14% |
| Avaya | 49.9 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | contract 20%, standard 40%, builds-on-platform 10%, distribution 30% |
| Avery Dennison | 47.0 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 75%, distribution 25% |
| ecobee | 45.8 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 75% |
| Samsung | 42.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Ricoh USA | 37.0 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Atom Power | 35.8 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| AO Smith | 21.1 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Watsco | 19.8 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Dandelion Energy | 18.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| SolarEdge | 18.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Virtual Peaker | 18.3 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
mixed 1 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi | 49.0 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | standard 45%, covered 36%, builds-on-platform 9%, unknown 9% |
long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Nest Smart Device Management | 2.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 100% |
undeclared 11 · declares nothing we can read: no number
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earable | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Glowforge | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| JUUL | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Kateeva | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Liesheng Group | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Metalenz | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Nest | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Neurable | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Owletcare | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| UBTech | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Wyze | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - |
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.