Energy Subsurface (oil & gas data standards, mining)

Where this market publishes its structure

• The Open Group OSDU Forum membership report (reports.opengroup.org/osdu_forum.shtml) machine-readable, 193 members, 192 with a website; 13 in-market providers linked; 18 out-of-market (hyperscalers, SIs, storage) held
• The Open Group Energistics Consortium membership report (reports.opengroup.org/energistics.shtml) machine-readable, 57 members; no website column (taken from the OSDU row, exact name); 8 linked
• Energistics WITSML certified products (energistics.org v1.4.1.1 + v1.3.1 lists) machine-readable, 78 products / 44 companies; names only; 4 linked (Halliburton, Baker Hughes, Schlumberger current; NOV v1.3.1 lapsed)
• PIDX current members (pidx.org/current-members/) machine-readable, 17 logos, 13 with a website link; 6 linked; DTN, EDICOM out-of-market
• ICMM company members (icmm.com/our-members + member pages) machine-readable, 26 company members, 25 with a website; 4 linked; association members (trade bodies) not read
• OSDU certified / compliant products not machine-readable: no register published; the OSDU Data Platform Standard v1.0 is 'a foundation for certification', no product list
• Global Mining Guidelines Group members (gmggroup.org) not machine-readable: SiteGround sgcaptcha bot challenge on every request; not bypassed
• The Open Group EMMM Forum membership not machine-readable: membership report says the forum is inactive
• Energistics product catalog (products by standard / vendor) not machine-readable: vendor-listed 'uses the standard' products are shape, report-only; not read this pass

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-21 from the 38 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

standard 21 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 15 · declares nothing we can read: no number