Mining
Providers using this tag (78)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 42 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Mining” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 72 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Mining, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.5 | -3 | 72 |
| Discoverability | 57.1 | 61 | -3.9 | 72 |
| Access Clarity | 20.2 | 26.5 | -6.3 | 72 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.3 | 14 | -9.7 | 72 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.1 | 23.4 | -12.3 | 72 |
| Contract Quality | 7.1 | 20.1 | -13 | 72 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 13% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Benchmark Minerals 54.3
- 2 Bureau of Land Management 47.2
- 3 Caterpillar 41.1
- 4 Propeller Aero 37.3
- 5 CAT 36
- 6 Monero 32.6
- 7 VRIFY 28.7
- 8 Minerstat 28.6
- 9 Adionics 28.3
- 10 CONSOL Energy 27.6
- 1 Bureau of Land Management 39.8
- 2 Benchmark Minerals 37.9
- 3 EnergyX 36.5
- 4 Aarav Unmanned Systems (Aereo) 31.9
- 5 Adionics 30.7
- 6 CONSOL Energy 30
- 7 Alliance Resource Partners 30
- 8 Impossible Metals 29.7
- 9 Propeller Aero 24.5
- 10 Tronox Holdings 23.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.