Oil and Gas
Oil & GasOil and Gas
Providers using this tag (101)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 67 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
101 providers carry this tag directly, and 137 counting the 9 narrower tags below — 36 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 86 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Oil and Gas, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.6 | 6.3 | -0.7 | 86 |
| Discoverability | 50.3 | 58.1 | -7.8 | 86 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.7 | 13.7 | -10 | 86 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11 | 23.2 | -12.2 | 86 |
| Contract Quality | 5.2 | 17.6 | -12.4 | 86 |
| Access Clarity | 12.8 | 26.5 | -13.7 | 86 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 1% | 14% | -13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 12% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Corva AI 55.8
- 2 Shell 51
- 3 ComboCurve 44.6
- 4 Validere 43.5
- 5 Quorum Software 41.1
- 6 Helmerich & Payne 33.7
- 7 Innovapptive 31.2
- 8 Baker Hughes 30.1
- 9 Drillinginfo 29.8
- 10 Tachyus 29.2
- 1 Validere 40.1
- 2 Corva AI 33.2
- 3 Helmerich & Payne 30.6
- 4 Andium 27.2
- 5 Shell 24.4
- 6 Tachyus 24.3
- 7 Quorum Software 22.7
- 8 ComboCurve 19.6
- 9 Baker Hughes 17.6
- 10 Plains All American Pipeline 17.6
Coverage caveat. 84 of 86 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.