Natural Gas
Providers using this tag (84)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 45 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Natural Gas” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 76 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Natural Gas, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.4 | +0.1 | 76 |
| Discoverability | 56.4 | 61.2 | -4.8 | 76 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.6 | 14 | -7.4 | 76 |
| Contract Quality | 9 | 19.8 | -10.8 | 76 |
| Access Clarity | 14.5 | 26.5 | -12 | 76 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.2 | 23.4 | -12.2 | 76 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 1% | 10% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 1% | 13% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 CMS Energy 62.2
- 2 Consolidated Edison 55.1
- 3 EIA 49.8
- 4 FERC 47.6
- 5 Department of Energy 44.8
- 6 CenterPoint Energy 38.7
- 7 EPCOR 36.4
- 8 Archrock 36
- 9 Thermal Power 35.9
- 10 TECO Energy 35
- 1 CMS Energy 32.9
- 2 FERC 31.5
- 3 Thermal Power 29.6
- 4 EIA 28.3
- 5 Consolidated Edison 27.9
- 6 Archrock 26.3
- 7 EPCOR 25.8
- 8 Xcel Energy 24.8
- 9 Cheniere Energy 24.6
- 10 Enterprise Products Partners 20
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.