LF Energy Projects and Members (grid, DER, EV charging open source)
Standards market (lf energy landscape membership + listing, lf energy project contributors). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- LF Energy Landscape (github.com/lf-energy/lfenergy-landscape landscape.yml @1364cff4a6; landscape.lfenergy.org) machine-readable, 1,561 entries (95 member rows: LF Energy Strategic 6 / General 27 / Associate 46, LFESS Steering 6 / General 10; 46 LF-hosted projects / WGs; 1,420 listed); 21 providers linked (29 entries)
- LF Energy project pages (lfenergy.org/projects/ + 41 project detail pages) machine-readable, 41 projects, 104 organisation mentions (logo grids, Key Contributors / Other Contributing Organizations lists, initiated-by sentences); 5 providers linked (enedis, ge-vernova, schneider-electric-exchange, tennet, tesla); most initiators (RTE, Alliander, Pionix, S44, Seita, Recurve, Sony CSL) have no catalog repo
- LFX Insights contributing organisations (insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org) not machine-readable: client-rendered app; not read (project pages link it as the full list)
- lfenergy.org/members not machine-readable: not read: the landscape member categories carry the same tiers with homepage_url
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 77 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Energy 94%, Utilities 38%, Demand Response 36%, EV Charging 35%, Virtual Power Plant 31%, Electricity 30%, Grid 29%, Distributed Energy Resources 26%, Electric Vehicles 22%, Solar 22% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Energy 97%, Electric Vehicles 32%, Connectivity 23%, IoT 21% |
| Industries | Energy 92%, Climate & Sustainability 53%, Mobility & Fleet 43%, Utilities 38%, IoT & Connected Devices 25% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
coverage 2 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UtilityAPI | 48.9 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, coverage 50% |
| Open Charge Map | 46.6 | 28 | 0 / 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 4%, coverage 96% |
covered 8 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enedis | 35.3 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 50% |
| Tesla Energy | 28.1 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| Ameren | 19.8 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| Con Edison | 19.4 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| Xcel Energy | 19.4 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| TECO Energy | 18.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| 1KOMMA5° | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| Ubitricity | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
regulated 1 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lunar Energy | 26.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 100% |
standard 33 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gridwiz | 62.0 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 25%, standard 75% |
| Enphase Energy | 59.5 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 25%, standard 50%, covered 25% |
| Flipturn | 56.0 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 67%, builds-on-platform 33% |
| Tesla | 55.8 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 9%, standard 64%, covered 27% |
| Blink Charging | 54.9 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 75%, covered 25% |
| EnergyHub | 54.9 | 33 | 0 / 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| EV Connect | 54.9 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, covered 25%, builds-on-platform 25% |
| Schneider Electric Exchange | 54.1 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 86%, distribution 14% |
| Southern California Edison | 53.3 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 60%, covered 40% |
| Hydro-Québec | 53.0 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 60%, covered 40% |
| ENTSO-E | 51.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| MISO | 51.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| TenneT | 51.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| GE Vernova | 47.1 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 80%, distribution 20% |
| Itron | 46.2 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 67%, distribution 33% |
| Climatiq | 44.1 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 67%, distribution 33% |
| WattTime | 40.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 75% |
| The Mobility House | 37.7 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Enbala | 36.6 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| FLO | 36.6 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Landis+Gyr | 35.4 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| DNV | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Electricity Maps | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| OpenEI | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Singularity | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| AutoGrid | 29.0 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| Blueprint Power | 18.3 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Virtual Peaker | 18.3 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| AVEVA | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| BRICK Schema | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| General Electric | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Gridware | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Utilidata | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
mixed 1 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enel X | 56.0 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 33%, standard 33%, covered 33% |
long-tail 2 · reached only through iPaaS bridges
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohmconnect | 2.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 100% |
| Reposit Power | 2.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 100% |
distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bidgely | 19.2 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | distribution 100% |
undeclared 29 · declares nothing we can read: no number
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEMO | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Amperecloud | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Axle Energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ConnectDER | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| CPower | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Energy and Utilities | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ev.energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flexitricity | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| gridX | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Haven Energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hive Power | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Husk Power Systems | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hexing Electrical | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Kevala | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Leap | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Lemonflow | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Meshcrafts | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Nanogrid | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| OpenADR Alliance | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Optiwatt | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Powernaut | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Silver Spring Networks * | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Swell Energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Tantalus | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Tibo Energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Uplight | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Voltus | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| WeaveGrid | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Westar Energy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - |
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.