Utilities
Utilitiesutilities
Providers using this tag (190)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 32 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 58 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 52 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (84)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (66)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Utilities” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 66 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 181 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Utilities, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.3 | 23.4 | +2.9 | 181 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.9 | 14 | +1.9 | 181 |
| Contract Governance | 7.8 | 6.4 | +1.4 | 181 |
| Discoverability | 61.7 | 61.2 | +0.5 | 181 |
| Access Clarity | 25.1 | 26.5 | -1.4 | 181 |
| Contract Quality | 17.8 | 19.8 | -2 | 181 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 10% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Eliq 67.7
- 2 EDF Energy 66.5
- 3 UK Power Networks 66
- 4 Xoserve 64.2
- 5 Electricity North West 64
- 6 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 60.6
- 7 Northern Powergrid 60
- 8 OpenADR Alliance 58.5
- 9 AEMO 58.2
- 10 Origin Energy 57.9
- 1 ev.energy 53.3
- 2 Amber Electric 47.7
- 3 Southwest Power Pool 43.3
- 4 Hydro-Québec 43.1
- 5 Southern California Edison 42.7
- 6 Eliq 41.2
- 7 AEMO 40.8
- 8 Origin Energy 40.5
- 9 Green Button Alliance 39.9
- 10 Pacific Gas and Electric 39.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.