Utilities
Providers using this tag (194)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 35 Limited public surface area
Emerging 58 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 57 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (67)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Utilities” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 67 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
194 providers carry this tag directly, and 219 counting the 4 narrower tags below — 25 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 186 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Utilities, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.4 | 23.2 | +3.2 | 186 |
| Operational Transparency | 16 | 13.7 | +2.3 | 186 |
| Discoverability | 59.6 | 58.1 | +1.5 | 186 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.3 | +1.3 | 186 |
| Contract Quality | 16.8 | 17.6 | -0.8 | 186 |
| Access Clarity | 25.4 | 26.5 | -1.1 | 186 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 EDF Energy 62.2
- 2 Eliq 62.1
- 3 UK Power Networks 61.7
- 4 Xoserve 60
- 5 Electricity North West 58.7
- 6 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 56.5
- 7 Pacific Gas and Electric 55.5
- 8 Northern Powergrid 54.8
- 9 OpenADR Alliance 54.5
- 10 AEMO 53.7
- 1 ev.energy 53.3
- 2 Amber Electric 45.2
- 3 Southwest Power Pool 43.3
- 4 Eliq 42.9
- 5 Hydro-Québec 40.6
- 6 Origin Energy 40.5
- 7 Southern California Edison 40.2
- 8 Voltair 39
- 9 AEMO 38.9
- 10 EDF Energy 38.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.