LF Energy Landscape (open-source grid, utilities, EV and DER)
Register market (lf energy + lfess membership, landscape project maintainers). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- LF Energy landscape (landscape.lfenergy.org/data/full.json, landscape2) machine-readable, 1,561 items; LF Energy members 79 (strategic 6, general 27, associate 46), LFESS members 16 (steering 6, general 10); 13 in-market members linked
- LF Energy landscape project attributions (full.json crunchbase_url -> crunchbase_data homepage) machine-readable, 448 attributed organisations, mostly labs, agencies and universities (held); 10 linked as maintainers
- LF Energy project repos (MAINTAINERS / GOVERNANCE / CODEOWNERS of 46 projects and working groups) machine-readable, only Arras (TSC Organization column) and OpenDSM (Recurve) name organisations; the rest list GitHub handles, never resolved to employers; 2 linked (southern-california-edison, ge-vernova)
- landscape.lfenergy.org (HTML view) machine-readable, client-rendered view of the same full.json; used for spot checks only
- GXF / Grid eXchange Fabric not machine-readable: not listed in the landscape (archived LF Energy project); no maintainer register
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 17 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Energy 88%, Sustainability 41%, Electricity 35%, Grid 35%, Utilities 29%, Demand Response 29%, Energy Markets 24% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Energy 94%, Sustainability 47% |
| Industries | Energy 88%, Climate & Sustainability 82%, Utilities 29%, IoT & Connected Devices 24%, Mobility & Fleet 24% |
| Areas | Industrial 12% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UtilityAPI | 48.9 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 50%, coverage 50% |
covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDF Energy | 52.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 25%, covered 75% |
standard 15 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoFlow | 58.1 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 17%, standard 67%, covered 17% |
| Tesla | 55.8 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 9%, standard 64%, covered 27% |
| Eaton | 55.2 | 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 83%, covered 8%, builds-on-platform 8% |
| SunPower | 54.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 33%, standard 67% |
| Schneider Electric Exchange | 54.1 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 86%, distribution 14% |
| Southern California Edison | 53.3 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 60%, covered 40% |
| Hydro-Québec | 53.0 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 60%, covered 40% |
| ENTSO-E | 51.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| MISO | 51.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| TenneT | 51.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| GE Vernova | 47.1 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 80%, distribution 20% |
| Climatiq | 44.1 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 67%, distribution 33% |
| WattTime | 40.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 75% |
| Electricity Maps | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Singularity | 34.5 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.