Solar
Providers using this tag (124)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 49 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Solar” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
124 providers carry this tag directly, and 127 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 3 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 113 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Solar, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 18 | 17.6 | +0.4 | 113 |
| Discoverability | 58 | 58.1 | -0.1 | 113 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.1 | 23.2 | -0.1 | 113 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.3 | -0.4 | 113 |
| Access Clarity | 25.7 | 26.5 | -0.8 | 113 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.8 | 13.7 | -0.9 | 113 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Enphase Energy 63.8
- 2 OpenWeatherMap 61.9
- 3 Tesla Energy 55.8
- 4 Coperniq 55.4
- 5 Origin Energy 53.7
- 6 Terabase Energy 53.1
- 7 Solcast 52.8
- 8 SolarEdge 52.7
- 9 ev.energy 52.2
- 10 Octopus Energy 51.6
- 1 Terabase Energy 58.9
- 2 ev.energy 53.3
- 3 Amber Electric 45.2
- 4 Origin Energy 40.5
- 5 Southern California Edison 40.2
- 6 Enphase Energy 36.9
- 7 Sunrise Sunset 35.8
- 8 Coperniq 32.1
- 9 MISO 31.5
- 10 Wattwatchers 31.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.