Solar
Providers using this tag (129)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 56 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Solar” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
129 providers carry this tag directly, and 132 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 3 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Energy and Utilities | 40% |
| LF Energy Projects and Members (grid, DER, EV charging open source) | 22% |
| Carbon Accounting Disclosure Standards (SBTi, PCAF, CDP, GHG Protocol) | 21% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 115 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Solar, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 17.3 | 17.2 | +0.1 | 115 |
| Discoverability | 57.9 | 57.9 | 0 | 115 |
| Contract Governance | 6.2 | 6.5 | -0.3 | 115 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.5 | 23.2 | -0.7 | 115 |
| Access Clarity | 22.9 | 23.9 | -1 | 115 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.3 | 13 | -1.7 | 115 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 16% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Enphase Energy 65.2
- 2 Amber Electric 64.8
- 3 Origin Energy 59.6
- 4 Coperniq 55.4
- 5 Endeavour Energy 54.9
- 6 Con Edison 54.4
- 7 OpenWeatherMap 54.1
- 8 Terabase Energy 53.6
- 9 ev.energy 52.3
- 10 Google Maps Platform 51.3
- 1 Terabase Energy 57.8
- 2 ev.energy 54.2
- 3 Amber Electric 47.5
- 4 Southern California Edison 41.7
- 5 Origin Energy 40.3
- 6 Enphase Energy 35.9
- 7 Sunrise Sunset 35.8
- 8 Endeavour Energy 35
- 9 Coperniq 34
- 10 MISO 33.5
Coverage caveat. 102 of 115 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.