Clean Energy
Providers using this tag (177)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
CruxNexampLevelTen EnergyInspireAvina Clean HydrogenAvaadaAptera MotorsAmerescoGroup14 TechnologiesAddis EnergyAESAMMPRhythmosHydrostorFirst SolarXGS EnergyKolomaBase PowerMainspring EnergySightenRenew FinancialHaven EnergyClearbluemarketsRunwiseDandelion EnergyCactosLast EnergyLightshipOptivolt LabsConstellation EnergyBluwaveaiQuaise Energy
Minimal 137 Almost no public developer surface
OmnidianIGO LimitedConnectDEREquilibrium EnergyCleanCapitalChart IndustriesCleanenergyconnectGeneral FusionNth CycleBattery SmartBloom EnergyMayMaan ResearchOhmiumStoreDotAalo AtomicsAeremAiko SolarAmogyBolt.EarthCapstone TurbineExplomarForum MobilityIontraMazama EnergySakuuSOLS EnergySwell EnergyTiger New EnergyTwelveZeroAviaThea EnergyDavid EnergySunrunGravityAnthro EnergySolarCycleAntora EnergyNiron MagneticsElectric HydrogenExowattHyperStrongInertiaMarvel FusionProxima FusionWunderZanskarCarbon CaptureCF Industries HoldingsElectraBrilliant Light PowerVerdagySolfacilCandelaCubenergyEcolectroLowercarbon CapitalSavion AerospaceSunEdisonBlocPowerHelioRecCommonwealth Fusion SystemsCHINTLytenRealta FusionSizable EnergyUnited SolarEnerVenueSila NanotechnologiesNitricityAether FuelsAlva EnergyElement ZeroGokinGreen Canopy NODEPetra PowerPhoton Crystal EnergyHelion EnergyKairos PowerTerraPowerIdeal Power ConvertersAirloom EnergyApollo AtomicsSoma EnergyTeraWatt TechnologyHoltec InternationalNuScale PowerX-energyNewcleoThe Nuclear CompanyForm EnergyTAE TechnologiesUtility GlobalACT-ionAlsym EnergyCoreshellGCLLi IndustriesMoment EnergyNew Jersey ResourcesPacific FusionQuantumscapeRadiantSpiritusModern ElectronGlassPointNextEra EnergyOkloZap EnergyAmphiformBlueprint PowerCircularity FuelsEndurance EnergyFourth PowerMolten IndustriesPowerTap HydrogenSalient EnergySolsticeNanogridFervo EnergyFourierLydianSunFarmerAdvanced IonicsAmber WaveEstes EnergyGravitiMarvel Tech (Mufan Power)Modular Wind EnergySolar CityZephyr FusionArbor EnergyClearFlame EnginesAdvent SolarAquaHydrexMoxion Power CoSolar MosaicUniversal Hydrogen
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.2
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
10.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
13.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
177 providers carry this tag directly, and 273 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 96 more to reach.
Related tags
Energy Storage 35 co-occurrences
Solar 37 co-occurrences
Renewable Energy 37 co-occurrences
Climate Tech 34 co-occurrences
Energy 100 co-occurrences
Hydrogen 21 co-occurrences
Power Generation 16 co-occurrences
Electric Vehicles 23 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag178
Api tag1
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Energy and Utilities | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 154 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Clean Energy, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
154
of 176 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
2.3
-9.7 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 154 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 3Thin 3Emerging 37Minimal 110
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 1.4 | 6.5 | -5.1 | 154 |
| Discoverability | 51.8 | 57.9 | -6.1 | 154 |
| Access Clarity | 14.2 | 23.9 | -9.7 | 154 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.5 | 13 | -10.5 | 154 |
| Contract Quality | 3 | 17.2 | -14.2 | 154 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 7.8 | 23.2 | -15.4 | 154 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 1% | 12% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 16% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Enphase Energy
- 2 Tesla Energy
- 3 Palmetto
- 4 SolarEdge
- 5 UtilityAPI
- 6 Tesla
- 7 WattTime
- 8 Open Charge Map
- 9 Aptera Motors
- 10 Group14 Technologies
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Enphase Energy {"score" => 35.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 WattTime {"score" => 29.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Palmetto {"score" => 26.4, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 4 Tesla Energy {"score" => 26.1, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 5 SolarEdge {"score" => 25.9, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 6 Open Charge Map {"score" => 25.6, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 7 Tesla {"score" => 22.7, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 8 Aptera Motors {"score" => 21, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 9 UtilityAPI {"score" => 19.6, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 10 First Solar {"score" => 17.6, "band" => "agent-aware"}
All 176 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 154 carry a score (88%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 150 of 154 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 150 of 154 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.