Climate Tech
Providers using this tag (120)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 88 Almost no public developer surface
Quaise EnergyCommonsTerra CO2Aalo AtomicsCharm IndustrialEpic CleanTecForward EarthMazama EnergyOmnitron SensorsUBQ MaterialsLanzaJetResynergiNormative247SolarAntora EnergyExowattInertiaMarvel FusionElectraVerdagyEarth AIVisolisSealedAssembly OSMLowercarbon CapitalForteraLilac SolutionsWestbound Equity Partners280 EarthJimmySylveraBlocPowerWindfall BioTerrascopeGreenlyteBrimstoneHertha MetalsNeocarbonSublime SystemsThermondoAether FuelsNitricityPivot BioGyre EnergyKintra FibersAirloom EnergyUtility GlobalHeart AerospaceModern ElectronBlue Ocean BarnsAeroShieldAgainKlimaPachamaTerranox AIAir ProteinPlantdSOURCE GlobalWhole SurplusBoston MetalClairityCoolantKairos AerospaceZap EnergyArcturusCircularity FuelsElectroflowEndurance EnergyFourth PowerHydro Wind EnergyMolten IndustriesPanthalassaSalient EnergyC16 BiosciencesOrbicle BioRemoraSamsara EcoCowboy Clean FuelsFourierLydianAdvanced IonicsSupercriticalFervo EnergySmaltRise ReformingIron OxMicroByreViridos
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Frequency
57.2
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
12.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
8.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Clean Energy 33 co-occurrences
Decarbonization 15 co-occurrences
Carbon Removal 13 co-occurrences
Renewable Energy 16 co-occurrences
Sustainability 45 co-occurrences
Hydrogen 9 co-occurrences
Energy 49 co-occurrences
Carbon Capture 8 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag120
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 107 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Climate Tech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
107
of 120 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
11.1
-11.8 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
4.1
-7.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
2.9–53.1
median 8.1 · σ 10.3
How the 107 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 5Thin 4Emerging 22Minimal 76
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.7 | 6.3 | -3.6 | 107 |
| Discoverability | 53.3 | 58.1 | -4.8 | 107 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.9 | 13.7 | -10.8 | 107 |
| Access Clarity | 14.5 | 26.5 | -12 | 107 |
| Contract Quality | 3.9 | 17.6 | -13.7 | 107 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 8.3 | 23.2 | -14.9 | 107 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 14% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Terabase Energy 53.1
- 2 Clevergy 51
- 3 Lokki 49.1
- 4 Leap 45.6
- 5 Sense 42.6
- 6 Electra 31.4
- 7 Isometric 29.2
- 8 CarbonFarm 27.7
- 9 Goodvest 27
- 10 Underdog 25.9
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Terabase Energy 58.9
- 2 Isometric 45.3
- 3 Underdog 39.9
- 4 CarbonFarm 34.7
- 5 Lokki 33.7
- 6 Clevergy 30.8
- 7 Leap 28.2
- 8 Sense 24.8
- 9 Resynergi 19.1
- 10 Haven Energy 13.3
All 120 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 107 carry a score (89%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 106 of 107 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 106 of 107 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.