Renewable Energy
Variants seen in the corpus:
Green EnergyRenewable Energy
Providers using this tag (131)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
National Renewable Energy LaboratoryRatedPowerSkySpecsAESXGS EnergyHydrostorFirst SolarAI ClearingTemAMMPterralayrFlexGen Power SystemsAltarock EnergyLevelTen EnergyClooverAmperecloudInspireNexampRondo EnergyFuseInvesdorSightenHithiumAstronergyAvaadaBrighteBraven EnvironmentalEnurgenHusk Power SystemsOmnidianControlled Thermal ResourcesGridwiz
Minimal 85 Almost no public developer surface
SOLS EnergyBlattnertechkWh AnalyticsIndian Energy ExchangePowerledgerSunEdisonBrightSource EnergyNextEra EnergyQuanta ServicesCrocusenergyHydro Wind EnergyKazadi EnterprisesSolsticeBright35B AustraliaExporoSolarenCowboy Space Corporation (formerly Aetherflux)SunPowerAiko SolarMazama EnergySage GeosystemsAvathonZeitviewSunfiretrawa247SolarHeron PowerHyperStrongrabot.energyVolterCohnReznickEnpalBrightWunderfeld.energyCubenergyEnergy VaultUnited SolarBanyan InfrastructureHelioRecAyr EnergyCleanCapitalECO2GROWSizable EnergyBanyaninfrastructurecorporationClimavisionSkyfriAirloom EnergyLibra RoboticsGokinRadiaYuze SemiconductorAdvanced Solar PowerEnerVenueBrookfield Asset ManagementShepherdBarrelllithiumEnergyBankInRiskVoxel EnergyAlpha TechnologiesForm EnergyGCLSolarBridge TechnologiesSOURCE GlobalCirctecEndurance EnergyEnvision EnergyFourth PowerNikoPanthalassaSolactronyinglisolarSunFarmer1366 TechnologiesAdBm TechnologiesCandiFervo EnergyGridBankModular Wind EnergySmaltSolar CityAdvent SolarMakani *
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
NLR Buildings Energy APIsAPIs for energy efficiency and use of renewable technologies in residential and commercial buildings from N...NLR Solar Resource APIsSolar resource data and analysis APIs from NREL/NLR Developer Network, including NSRDB (National Solar Radi...NLR Wind Resource APIsWind resource data and analysis APIs from NREL/NLR Developer Network providing wind speed and direction dat...BPA Wind and Solar Generation DataBPA publishes real-time and historical wind and solar generation data for the Balancing Authority area. Dat...Ameren Renewables Portal APIThe Ameren Renewables Portal enables generation owners to manage community solar and collectively owned gen...
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Renewable Energy” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
57.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
12.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
10.4
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Solar 52 co-occurrences
Photovoltaics 20 co-occurrences
Clean Energy 37 co-occurrences
Energy Storage 24 co-occurrences
Energy 77 co-occurrences
Battery Storage 10 co-occurrences
Climate Tech 16 co-occurrences
Solar Energy 9 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag132
Api tag6
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 118 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Renewable Energy, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
118
of 131 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
12.4
-9.8 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
4.2
-7.8 vs catalog 12
Spread
0–53.6
median 9.4 · σ 11.5
How the 118 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 9Thin 4Emerging 31Minimal 74
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.5 | 6.5 | -4 | 118 |
| Discoverability | 53.4 | 57.9 | -4.5 | 118 |
| Access Clarity | 16 | 23.9 | -7.9 | 118 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.8 | 13 | -9.2 | 118 |
| Contract Quality | 5.6 | 17.2 | -11.6 | 118 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 9.7 | 23.2 | -13.5 | 118 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 13% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 16% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Terabase Energy 53.6
- 2 Solcast 51.2
- 3 Shell 49.4
- 4 GE Vernova 45.6
- 5 SolarEdge 45.2
- 6 Ostrom 45.1
- 7 Octopus Energy 44.9
- 8 PVcase 44.9
- 9 Reonic 39.8
- 10 Department of Energy 38.6
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Terabase Energy 57.8
- 2 GE Vernova 41.5
- 3 Off Grid Stores - All Things Off-Grid Solar 35.3
- 4 1KOMMA5° 31.8
- 5 Ostrom 31.5
- 6 Reonic 30
- 7 SolarEdge 25.9
- 8 Shell 25
- 9 Solcast 24.6
- 10 Octopus Energy 24.1
All 131 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 118 carry a score (90%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 114 of 118 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 114 of 118 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.