Electric Vehicles
Electric VehicleEVElectric Vehicles
Providers using this tag (162)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 43 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 88 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Electric Vehicles” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
162 providers carry this tag directly, and 223 counting the 2 narrower tags below and the 2 beneath them — 61 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 153 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Electric Vehicles, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.8 | 6.3 | -2.5 | 153 |
| Discoverability | 55.2 | 58.1 | -2.9 | 153 |
| Access Clarity | 19.8 | 26.5 | -6.7 | 153 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.3 | 13.7 | -7.4 | 153 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.2 | 23.2 | -9 | 153 |
| Contract Quality | 7.5 | 17.6 | -10.1 | 153 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ev.energy 52.2
- 2 Octopus Energy 51.6
- 3 Benchmark Minerals 50.2
- 4 Hyundai 48.4
- 5 Volteras 47.4
- 6 Flipturn 46.8
- 7 Cariqa 44.3
- 8 Department of Energy 44.3
- 9 The Mobility House 42.6
- 10 Axle Energy 41.9
- 1 ev.energy 53.3
- 2 Benchmark Minerals 35.8
- 3 Vanderhall Motor Works 35.6
- 4 Axle Energy 34
- 5 Volteras 33.6
- 6 Also 33.5
- 7 1KOMMA5° 31.5
- 8 Hyundai 29.3
- 9 Franklin Whole Home 29
- 10 The Mobility House 28.4
Coverage caveat. 145 of 153 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.