Connected Vehicles
Variants seen in the corpus:
Connected VehicleConnected CarConnected CarsConnected Vehicles
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 27 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Mercedes-Benz Electric Vehicle Status APIThe Electric Vehicle Status API (currently at v3) provides charge state, state-of-charge percent, remaining...Mercedes-Benz Fleet APIThe Mercedes-Benz Fleet API integrates vehicle data into fleet management systems without retrofit hardware...Mercedes-Benz Fuel Status APIThe Fuel Status API exposes a Mercedes-Benz combustion vehicle's current tank level, remaining fuel range i...Mercedes-Benz Pay As You Drive 2.0 APIThe Pay As You Drive 2.0 API supplies precise odometer readings and geographical position for a consented M...Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Lock Status APIThe Vehicle Lock Status API returns the current door-lock, deck-lid, and position-lock state of a Mercedes-...Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Status APIThe Vehicle Status API delivers real-time vehicle state — doors, windows, deck lid, sunroof, tire pressure,...INRIX Dangerous Slowdowns APIDetects and reports sudden, unexpected slowdowns on the road network so vehicles and drivers can be warned ...Hyundai Developers Connected Car APIHyundai Developers exposes connected-car data from Bluelink-enrolled vehicles to third-party services over ...
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
BMW Open Data PlatformThe BMW Open Data Platform provides developers, researchers, and innovators with access to vehicle data inc...BMW Smart Maintenance APIThe BMW Smart Maintenance API provides real-time vehicle health and maintenance need information by connect...General MotorsYou can reach customers in their cars using GMs powerful, in-vehicle platform. Our tools can provide access...
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
ParkopediaWith the roll-out of connected cars, services such as live traffic and live parking have become standard re...MySubaru Companion Plan APIPlan tier surface (2026+ model years) covering SOS Emergency Assistance, Enhanced Roadside Assistance, Loca...MySubaru Connected Services APIPrivate connected-vehicle backend (formerly branded Subaru STARLINK) that powers the MySubaru mobile app an...MySubaru Safety & Security Plan APIPlan tier surface (2016-2025 model years) covering safety and security protection services with an upper ti...
Score breakdown
Frequency
51.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
19.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
13.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Telematics 38 co-occurrences
Vehicle Data 19 co-occurrences
Automotive 51 co-occurrences
Electric Vehicles 23 co-occurrences
Automobiles 7 co-occurrences
Mobility 27 co-occurrences
Vehicles 14 co-occurrences
Cars 7 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag66
Api tag16
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Automotive and Mobility | 40% |
| FMCSA Registered Electronic Logging Devices | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Connected Vehicles, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
63
of 66 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
19.7
-2.5 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
9.4
-2.6 vs catalog 12
Spread
0–54.9
median 16.3 · σ 13.8
How the 63 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 6Thin 13Emerging 19Minimal 24
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.5 | +0.5 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 56.5 | 57.9 | -1.4 | 63 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.6 | 23.2 | -1.6 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.9 | 13 | -3.1 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 14 | 17.2 | -3.2 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 18.9 | 23.9 | -5 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 16% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Amazon IoT FleetWise 54.9
- 2 Mercedes-Benz Mercedes me 50.4
- 3 INRIX 50.2
- 4 Volteras 47.4
- 5 Hyundai 46.9
- 6 Sheeva 41.9
- 7 Telenav 39.7
- 8 Smartcar 38.5
- 9 High Mobility 35.2
- 10 Kia 32.8
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Mercedes-Benz Mercedes me 43
- 2 Volteras 35.5
- 3 Otonomo 33.8
- 4 Sheeva 33.6
- 5 Hyundai 29.3
- 6 Federal Highway Administration 27.7
- 7 Ford 27.5
- 8 BMW ConnectedDrive 27.2
- 9 Amazon IoT FleetWise 25.3
- 10 High Mobility 23.7
All 66 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 63 carry a score (95%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 59 of 63 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 59 of 63 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.