HVAC
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “HVAC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
45 providers carry this tag directly, and 46 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged HVAC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 13.8 | 14 | -0.2 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 6.2 | 6.5 | -0.3 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 59.8 | 61 | -1.2 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 25.1 | 26.5 | -1.4 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.3 | 23.4 | -4.1 | 44 |
| Contract Quality | 14.9 | 20.1 | -5.2 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 13% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Aedifion 66.7
- 2 FieldPulse 61.3
- 3 Carrier Global 53.4
- 4 ServiceTitan 52.1
- 5 Housecall Pro 50.4
- 6 75F 43
- 7 PassiveLogic 40
- 8 Sensibo 39
- 9 BRICK Schema 38.4
- 10 Commusoft 38.1
- 1 Aedifion 50.2
- 2 Carrier Global 41.5
- 3 FieldPulse 40.8
- 4 PassiveLogic 37.2
- 5 Hello Therma 32.7
- 6 BuildOps 28.4
- 7 BRICK Schema 28.1
- 8 Sensibo 24.8
- 9 ServiceTitan 24.4
- 10 Housecall Pro 22.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.