niche · 0.4 capabilitymarket resourceindustry

Field Service Management

Score 18.4 / 100 39 providers 4 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (39)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (4)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented

Score breakdown

Frequency
44.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.0
spread across providers
Quality lift
34.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Dispatching 5 co-occurrences Mobile Workforce 5 co-occurrences Plumbing 5 co-occurrences Dispatch 7 co-occurrences HVAC 6 co-occurrences Home Services 7 co-occurrences Contractors 5 co-occurrences Work Orders 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag39
Api tag4

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 36 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Field Service Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
36
of 39 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
29
+6.1 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
16.5
+4.6 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.7–59.3
median 30.7 · σ 16.8
How the 36 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 7Thin 10Emerging 10Minimal 6
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 28.7 17.6 +11.1 36
Access Clarity 35.1 26.5 +8.6 36
Operational Transparency 19.5 13.7 +5.8 36
Discoverability 63.5 58.1 +5.4 36
Developer Ergonomics 26.1 23.2 +2.9 36
Contract Governance 4.3 6.3 -2 36

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 16% 14% +2
MCP server (first-party) 13% 12% +1
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 8% 11% -3
Security 95% 98% -3
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 16% 14% +2

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 FieldPulse 59.3
  2. 2 Coperniq 55.4
  3. 3 Jobber 54.8
  4. 4 D-Tools 53.6
  5. 5 ServiceTitan 53.6
  6. 6 Skedulo 53.2
  7. 7 Housecall Pro 48.7
  8. 8 Aerones 46.5
  9. 9 Zuper 45.6
  10. 10 PTC 39.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Jobber 45.3
  2. 2 Aerones 44.1
  3. 3 FieldPulse 38.7
  4. 4 Skedulo 38.5
  5. 5 Coperniq 32.1
  6. 6 D-Tools 29
  7. 7 BuildOps 28.4
  8. 8 Zuper 28.1
  9. 9 Service Fusion 24.8
  10. 10 Simpro 24.8
All 39 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 36 carry a score (92%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 21 of 36 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/field-service-management"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/field-service-management"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/field-service-management/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.