Real-Time
Real TimeReal-TimeReal-timeRealTimeRealtimerealtime
Providers using this tag (196)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 71 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 66 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (360)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 24 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 56 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 133 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 108 Limited public surface area
Emerging 38 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (236)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Real-Time” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 236 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 191 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Real-Time, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 43.3 | 19.8 | +23.5 | 191 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.8 | 23.4 | +19.4 | 191 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.6 | 13.9 | +14.7 | 191 |
| Access Clarity | 37.5 | 26.5 | +11 | 191 |
| Discoverability | 70 | 61.2 | +8.8 | 191 |
| Contract Governance | 10.5 | 6.4 | +4.1 | 191 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 13% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 14% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ClickHouse 68.7
- 2 X 68.5
- 3 Polygon 68.3
- 4 Heroic Labs 67.9
- 5 Dolby 65.7
- 6 Red5 65.6
- 7 SiftingIO 63.9
- 8 ThetaData 62.4
- 9 Inngest 60.4
- 10 Liveblocks 60.4
- 1 Polygon 63.1
- 2 X 61.8
- 3 Insforge 57.7
- 4 ClickHouse 57.6
- 5 Morningstar 56.8
- 6 Conviva 53.6
- 7 Twitter/X 48.5
- 8 Caretta 47.7
- 9 SIX 44
- 10 SiftingIO 41.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.