Voice
VoicesVoice
Providers using this tag (209)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 24 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 46 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 55 Limited public surface area
Emerging 38 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (150)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 54 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 39 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (58)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Voice” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 58 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
209 providers carry this tag directly, and 391 counting the 6 narrower tags below — 182 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 197 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Voice, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.3 | 17.6 | +15.7 | 197 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.8 | 23.2 | +15.6 | 197 |
| Access Clarity | 39.3 | 26.5 | +12.8 | 197 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.2 | 13.7 | +11.5 | 197 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 58.1 | +7.6 | 197 |
| Contract Governance | 8.8 | 6.3 | +2.5 | 197 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 14% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 12% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 14% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infobip 82.4
- 2 ElevenLabs 81.8
- 3 Telnyx 79.6
- 4 Amazon Pinpoint 78.9
- 5 Amazon Lex 78.1
- 6 Twilio 77.8
- 7 rtcStats 69.2
- 8 Sinch 68.3
- 9 Zoom Phone 67.4
- 10 SignalWire 65.4
- 1 Telnyx 83.6
- 2 Infobip 63
- 3 Speko 60.5
- 4 Bird 57.8
- 5 The Mobile First Company 55.4
- 6 Synthflow 54
- 7 Zoom Phone 53.6
- 8 ElevenLabs 52.7
- 9 AgentPhone 48.9
- 10 Spruce Health 48.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.