Text-to-Speech
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (45)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Text-to-Speech” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 66 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Text-to-Speech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.5 | 23.2 | +22.3 | 66 |
| Contract Quality | 38.5 | 17.6 | +20.9 | 66 |
| Access Clarity | 42.4 | 26.5 | +15.9 | 66 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.4 | 13.7 | +11.7 | 66 |
| Discoverability | 69.5 | 58.1 | +11.4 | 66 |
| Contract Governance | 7.9 | 6.3 | +1.6 | 66 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 14% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 12% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 14% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ElevenLabs 81.8
- 2 Captions 63.9
- 3 Amazon Polly 61
- 4 AutoContent API 60.4
- 5 Bluma 58.5
- 6 Actionpower 57.3
- 7 SLNG 53.6
- 8 Sarvam 53
- 9 Speko 50.5
- 10 Gemini 50.1
- 1 Sarj AI Developer API 67.3
- 2 AutoContent API 65.9
- 3 Speko 60.5
- 4 ElevenLabs 52.7
- 5 HeyGen 51.4
- 6 Bluma 50.9
- 7 Creatify 47.1
- 8 Fish Audio 44.6
- 9 Puppetry 43.9
- 10 useapi.net 39
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.