Audio
Providers using this tag (190)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 47 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 62 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (103)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 40 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (69)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Audio” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 69 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
190 providers carry this tag directly, and 207 counting the 4 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 17 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 169 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Audio, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 26.2 | 17.6 | +8.6 | 169 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.8 | 23.2 | +4.6 | 169 |
| Access Clarity | 30.3 | 26.5 | +3.8 | 169 |
| Discoverability | 61.2 | 58.1 | +3.1 | 169 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.6 | 13.7 | +1.9 | 169 |
| Contract Governance | 4.9 | 6.3 | -1.4 | 169 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 14% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 14% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ElevenLabs 81.8
- 2 Dolby 66.5
- 3 Lacuna 64.9
- 4 LALAL.AI 62.1
- 5 Magic Hour 62
- 6 PyannoteAI 61.5
- 7 Last.fm 61.1
- 8 AutoContent API 60.4
- 9 Blubrry API 56
- 10 Modulate 55.7
- 1 AutoContent API 65.9
- 2 Lacuna 57.2
- 3 Epidemic Sound 55.4
- 4 ElevenLabs 52.7
- 5 Magic Hour 51.3
- 6 Transistor 47.1
- 7 Podbean 44.6
- 8 Fish Audio 44.6
- 9 AudD 44.6
- 10 Dolby 40.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.