Voice Cloning
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Voice Cloning” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Voice Cloning, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53.4 | 19.8 | +33.6 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 46.6 | 26.5 | +20.1 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.7 | 23.4 | +18.3 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.2 | 14 | +18.2 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 71.4 | 61.2 | +10.2 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.4 | +2.7 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Inworld AI 65.1
- 2 LALAL.AI 64
- 3 Magic Hour 61.5
- 4 D-ID 52
- 5 Deepdub 49.3
- 6 KugelAudio 48.1
- 7 Gradium 47.9
- 8 Unisound 47
- 9 HeyGen 46.6
- 10 Neuphonic 46.6
- 1 Sarj AI Developer API 62.9
- 2 Magic Hour 37.3
- 3 LALAL.AI 37.2
- 4 HeyGen 35.2
- 5 Deepdub 33.2
- 6 Lingopal 29
- 7 KugelAudio 28.8
- 8 Fish Audio 28.4
- 9 Gradium 25.7
- 10 LMNT 25.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.