Voice Cloning
Voice Cloningvoice cloning
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Voice Cloning, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53.2 | 17.5 | +35.7 | 27 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.7 | 17.9 | +20.8 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 42.1 | 22.3 | +19.8 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.3 | 11.3 | +19 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 76.1 | 60.4 | +15.7 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 11.7 | 6.4 | +5.3 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 16% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 9% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 13% | +20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Inworld AI 66.7
- 2 LALAL.AI 62
- 3 useapi.net 55.4
- 4 D-ID 53.2
- 5 Deepdub 52
- 6 Gradium 50.8
- 7 KugelAudio 50.7
- 8 Neuphonic 47.8
- 9 StepFun 47.8
- 10 Unisound 47
- 1 Sarj AI Developer API 60.4
- 2 useapi.net 39
- 3 LALAL.AI 33.9
- 4 Deepdub 31.5
- 5 StepFun 30.6
- 6 Lingopal 29
- 7 KugelAudio 28.8
- 8 HeyGen 26.5
- 9 Gradium 25.7
- 10 LMNT 25.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/voice-cloning"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/voice-cloning"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/voice-cloning/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.