Market Data
Providers using this tag (361)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 35 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 106 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 113 Limited public surface area
Emerging 64 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 32 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (341)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 49 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 94 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 118 Limited public surface area
Emerging 59 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (59)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Market Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 59 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
361 providers carry this tag directly, and 362 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 351 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Market Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.1 | 24.5 | +18.6 | 351 |
| Contract Quality | 33.6 | 18.6 | +15 | 351 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.4 | 13.2 | +10.2 | 351 |
| Discoverability | 67.4 | 59.1 | +8.3 | 351 |
| Access Clarity | 37.9 | 30 | +7.9 | 351 |
| Contract Governance | 16 | 9.7 | +6.3 | 351 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 18% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 31% | 16% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 13% | +8 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 62% | 36% | +26 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Uphold 81.5
- 2 Upstox 77.4
- 3 Alpaca 77
- 4 Nordic Financial News 75.5
- 5 0xArchive 74.9
- 6 Cymetica 72.6
- 7 AlphaAI 72.2
- 8 Financial Modeling Prep 69
- 9 Gemini Trust Company 68.6
- 10 Twelve Data 66.9
- 1 Cymetica 73
- 2 Alpaca 69
- 3 AlphaAI 67.6
- 4 0xArchive 67
- 5 Nordic Financial News 66.1
- 6 Daloopa 64.6
- 7 Clear Street 60.8
- 8 Caplight 60.7
- 9 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 59.9
- 10 Upstox 59.8
Coverage caveat. 239 of 351 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.