Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrencycryptocurrency
Providers using this tag (403)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 24 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 89 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 82 Limited public surface area
Emerging 80 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 111 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (130)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 28 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 40 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cryptocurrency” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 372 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cryptocurrency, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.1 | 23.4 | +10.7 | 372 |
| Contract Quality | 26.6 | 19.8 | +6.8 | 372 |
| Discoverability | 66.1 | 61.2 | +4.9 | 372 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.6 | 13.9 | +4.7 | 372 |
| Contract Governance | 6.8 | 6.4 | +0.4 | 372 |
| Access Clarity | 24.6 | 26.5 | -1.9 | 372 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kraken 74.5
- 2 Braiins 68.2
- 3 Crypto.com 68.2
- 4 Uphold 68
- 5 Solana 67.1
- 6 Bullish 65.1
- 7 Solidus Labs 65.1
- 8 SiftingIO 63.9
- 9 Zerion 62.9
- 10 Ripio 62
- 1 EODHD 62.3
- 2 CryptoCompare 60.2
- 3 BTC War Live Market Data API 55
- 4 Ripple Labs 51.8
- 5 BVNK 50
- 6 Revolut 49.2
- 7 Brale 48
- 8 Sponge 47.5
- 9 Paxos 46.5
- 10 Crypto.com 45.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.