DeFi
Providers using this tag (304)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 62 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 88 Limited public surface area
Emerging 83 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 57 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “DeFi” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
304 providers carry this tag directly, and 314 counting the 5 narrower tags below — 10 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 298 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged DeFi, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.9 | 23.2 | +15.7 | 298 |
| Contract Quality | 26.3 | 17.6 | +8.7 | 298 |
| Discoverability | 64.3 | 58.1 | +6.2 | 298 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.2 | 13.7 | +3.5 | 298 |
| Contract Governance | 6.4 | 6.3 | +0.1 | 298 |
| Access Clarity | 22.6 | 26.5 | -3.9 | 298 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 0xArchive 71.6
- 2 Solana 65.9
- 3 Solidus Labs 65.5
- 4 Crypto.com 65
- 5 Cymetica 63.1
- 6 FarmDash Agent Hub 61.3
- 7 SiftingIO 61.1
- 8 Covalent 60.9
- 9 Zerion 60.8
- 10 OpenZeppelin 60.2
- 1 0xArchive 66.9
- 2 Cymetica 63.3
- 3 DefiLlama 49.5
- 4 Pyth 46.7
- 5 Crypto.com 45.1
- 6 HostDeFi 43.3
- 7 FarmDash Agent Hub 42.1
- 8 WealthVille — DeFi Liquidity Pool Scores API (Solana & EVM) 41.7
- 9 SiftingIO 41.5
- 10 Allium 41.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.