LF Decentralized Trust (Hyperledger) Members and Projects (enterprise blockchain, digital identity, CBDC)

Where this market publishes its structure

• LF Decentralized Trust Landscape (landscape.lfdecentralizedtrust.org/data/full.json; landscape.hyperledger.org 301s here) machine-readable, 305 entries: 135 members (Premier 5 / General 77 / Associate 53), 22 CSP rows (Fabric 12 / Besu 10), 14 LFDT projects, 6 standards bodies, 128 listed; 40 providers linked (52 landscape + 1 CSP rows)
• LFDT project MAINTAINERS files (github.com/hyperledger, github.com/LF-Decentralized-Trust-labs, landscape project repos, canton-network/splice) machine-readable, 200 repos scanned, 136 MAINTAINERS files, 92 (affiliation / e-mail domain) rows; 1 provider linked (hedera); IBM / Intel out-of-market; most maintainer orgs (Kaleido, IOG, Hitachi, DSR, Indicio, Animo) have no catalog repo
• LFDT member directory (lfdecentralizedtrust.org/members) not machine-readable: not read: the landscape member category carries the same tiers with homepage_url

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 96 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

covered 3 · reached mainly through aggregators

regulated 2 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

standard 44 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

core 1 · builds the connectors its customers need

mixed 2 · no single mode dominates

distribution 9 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 34 · declares nothing we can read: no number