Stablecoins
Variants seen in the corpus:
StablecoinStablecoins
Providers using this tag (138)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 19 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (27)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Fireblocks Tokenization APIDeploy, mint, burn, and manage tokens across the chains supported by Fireblocks Tokenization Engine. Covers...Airtm Wallet Resource (Connect) APIThe OAuth 2.0 resource server that lets a partner application move USDC in and out of an individual Airtm u...Figment Stablecoins APIThe Stablecoins API from Figment — 6 operation(s) for stablecoins.Blockdaemon Stablecoin APIThe stablecoin API from Blockdaemon — 1 operation(s) for stablecoin.
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Anchorage Digital Stablecoins APIEndpoints for stablecoin conversion operations including issuance and redemptionAmberdata Stablecoins APIThe Stablecoins API from Amberdata — 1 operation(s) for stablecoins.Sygnum Connect APIAPI for Sygnum Connect, the bank's 24/7 instant multi-asset settlement network for crypto assets, stablecoi...Blockworks Stablecoins APIModels documented under Stablecoins: Stablecoin Chains (table), Stablecoin Currencies (table), Stablecoin F...Chainalysis SentinelStablecoin-focused risk product that evaluates the risk profile of individual stablecoins, their issuers, a...TronZap REST APIREST API for TRON Energy and Bandwidth rental, energy subscriptions, and AML crypto checks. Endpoints inclu...TronZap Wallet Orders APIFully public, unauthenticated Orders API for non-custodial wallet integrations. Four operations — POST /v1/...
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Grid APIGrid is Squads' stablecoin API for accounts, payments, cards, and yield — letting developers build neobank-...Kite Stablecoin Gasless Transfer APIREST relayer that executes stablecoin transfers on behalf of users who hold no native gas token, authorized...Ethena Minting APIPublic request-for-quote (RFQ) minting and redemption API for USDe. Whitelisted participants check asset av...USDB Native StablecoinUSDB is Blast's native auto-rebasing stablecoin, redeemable 1:1 for DAI when bridged back to Ethereum. Back...PancakeSwap StableSwap Subgraph (BSC)GraphQL subgraph for querying PancakeSwap StableSwap pools on BNB Smart Chain, providing stable coin pair l...Gluwa APIREST API for the Gluwa borderless financial platform — balances, fees, transactions, payment QR codes, wrap...Bastion APIBastion's REST API for regulated stablecoin infrastructure: create and manage custodial wallets, issue and ...X402 AI 自助门店 x402 Facilitator APIA self-hosted x402 facilitator role on the same host - POST /facilitator/verify and POST /facilitator/settl...Bitso Payouts and Pay-Ins APICross-border disbursement and collection API powered by stablecoin and LATAM rails. Lets businesses fund in...Juno APIJuno is Bitso's programmable-money platform for Mexican peso (MXN) rails and stablecoin operations. The API...DefiLlama Public APIFree, no-auth REST API exposing 31+ endpoints for protocol TVL, chain TVL, coin prices, stablecoin metrics,...DefiLlama Stablecoins APIThe Stablecoins API from DefiLlama — 6 operation(s) for stablecoins.Lead Bank Move APIMoney-movement API spanning ACH, instant payments (RTP / FedNow), domestic and international wires, stablec...
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Stablecoins” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Amberdata
Blast
Blockdaemon
Blockworks
Chainalysis
FeedOracle Technologies
Figment
Lead Bank
Lightspark
PancakeSwap
Sygnum
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.2
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
35.8
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
12.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Cross-Border Payments 25 co-occurrences
DeFi 44 co-occurrences
Wallets 36 co-occurrences
Cryptocurrency 78 co-occurrences
Yield 17 co-occurrences
x402 23 co-occurrences
Digital Assets 23 co-occurrences
Blockchain 71 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag145
Api tag28
Openapi tag7
Openapi op tag24
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Stablecoins and Tokenization (stablecoin issuers, tokenized assets) | 73% |
| Argentine Fintech Registers (BCRA PSP + entities, CNV agents + PSAV, Cámara Fintech) | 30% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 136 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Stablecoins, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
136
of 138 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
22
+10 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 136 split by band
Exemplar 5Strong 10Developing 42Thin 27Emerging 29Minimal 23
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.7 | 23.2 | +20.5 | 136 |
| Contract Quality | 28.6 | 17.2 | +11.4 | 136 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.3 | 13 | +9.3 | 136 |
| Discoverability | 66.4 | 57.9 | +8.5 | 136 |
| Access Clarity | 28.9 | 23.9 | +5 | 136 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.5 | +2.6 | 136 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 13% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 12% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 16% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Hive Civilization
- 2 Hilt
- 3 SCVD General Store
- 4 AlgoVoi
- 5 Unstoppable Finance (Iron)
- 6 Ripio
- 7 brick.blue
- 8 Ultravioleta DAO
- 9 MERCURY
- 10 Airtm
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Ultravioleta DAO {"score" => 69.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 SCVD General Store {"score" => 64.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Hilt {"score" => 61.8, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 4 brick.blue {"score" => 60.1, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 5 Tesser {"score" => 55.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 AlgoVoi {"score" => 53.9, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 7 shveik {"score" => 51.6, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 8 BVNK {"score" => 51.1, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 9 Sponge {"score" => 51.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 N3XT {"score" => 50.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 138 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 136 carry a score (99%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 124 of 136 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 124 of 136 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.