x402
Providers using this tag (128)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 58 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (153)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 22 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 67 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “x402” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 127 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged x402, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 53.4 | 23.3 | +30.1 | 127 |
| Contract Quality | 41.1 | 17.8 | +23.3 | 127 |
| Access Clarity | 49.2 | 26.5 | +22.7 | 127 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.9 | 13.8 | +20.1 | 127 |
| Discoverability | 71.8 | 58 | +13.8 | 127 |
| Contract Governance | 16.7 | 6.3 | +10.4 | 127 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 83% | 15% | +68 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 83% | 13% | +70 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 13% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Agoragentic 80.5
- 2 Hive Civilization 74.8
- 3 MandateShield 73.9
- 4 Delx 72.6
- 5 Drippay 72
- 6 0xArchive 71.6
- 7 Hilt 71.3
- 8 SCVD General Store 70.7
- 9 TaskHawk Systems 69.9
- 10 FeedOracle Technologies 69.1
- 1 Agent Ready 72.9
- 2 Sirenic 70.9
- 3 AnyAPI 70.8
- 4 Ultravioleta DAO 69.1
- 5 FeedOracle Technologies 68.9
- 6 0xArchive 66.9
- 7 Kann KI das? Sponsoring Agent 66.6
- 8 Drippay 64.2
- 9 Hilt 63.9
- 10 Emboss 63.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.