Agentic Commerce
Agent CommerceAgentic-Commerce
Providers using this tag (318)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 21 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 44 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 87 Limited public surface area
Emerging 144 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (197)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 79 Limited public surface area
Emerging 90 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agentic Commerce” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
318 providers carry this tag directly, and 320 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Food Safety (GFSI-recognised certification) | 30% |
| x402 Micropayments & Agentic Pay-per-Call | 28% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 313 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agentic Commerce, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 57.9 | +13.3 | 313 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.1 | 22.1 | +12 | 313 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 25 | +11.4 | 313 |
| Contract Governance | 18 | 9.4 | +8.6 | 313 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.9 | 12.4 | +1.5 | 313 |
| Contract Quality | 17.2 | 18.2 | -1 | 313 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 90% | 16% | +74 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 14% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 66% | 13% | +53 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 35% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 90.6
- 2 Shopify 84.6
- 3 Stripe 81.5
- 4 Klarna 73.6
- 5 MandateShield 70.7
- 6 Agoragentic 70.1
- 7 Instacart 70
- 8 Medusa 70
- 9 Delx 69.4
- 10 Taskfolk 69.3
- 1 Sirenic 75.6
- 2 Agentcard 72.3
- 3 Taskfolk 69.1
- 4 Perplexity 67.7
- 5 SCVD General Store 64.1
- 6 PostalForm 59.7
- 7 Medusa 59.1
- 8 Stripe 58.5
- 9 cogDepot 57.9
- 10 Walmart 57.3
Coverage caveat. 258 of 313 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.