Agentic Commerce
Providers using this tag (174)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 48 Limited public surface area
Emerging 97 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (106)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agentic Commerce” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 174 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agentic Commerce, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 73.6 | 61 | +12.6 | 174 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.1 | 23.3 | +8.8 | 174 |
| Contract Governance | 13 | 6.3 | +6.7 | 174 |
| Access Clarity | 32.7 | 26.3 | +6.4 | 174 |
| Contract Quality | 14.3 | 19.8 | -5.5 | 174 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.3 | 13.9 | -7.6 | 174 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 91% | 10% | +81 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 93% | 9% | +84 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 78% | 11% | +67 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 14% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Rye 63.4
- 2 Medusa 62.7
- 3 Taskfolk 61.1
- 4 Agentcard 55.1
- 5 BuiltWith 53.8
- 6 Constructor.io 52.2
- 7 Swap 49.5
- 8 Merit Systems 47.4
- 9 Cure Hydration 47
- 10 Amboras 44.9
- 1 Agentcard 68.3
- 2 Taskfolk 64
- 3 Medusa 55.9
- 4 Hyperice 55
- 5 Liquid Death 54.2
- 6 Brooklinen 53.1
- 7 Fnatic 51.1
- 8 Also 50.8
- 9 Quip NYC 50.4
- 10 Tecovas 50.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.