E-Commerce
Providers using this tag (1706)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 33 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 58 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 162 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 256 Limited public surface area
Emerging 493 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 700 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (322)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 21 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 128 Limited public surface area
Emerging 109 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (46)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “E-Commerce” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
1706 providers carry this tag directly, and 2714 counting the 16 narrower tags below and the 2 beneath them — 1008 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1556 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged E-Commerce, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 59.5 | 58.1 | +1.4 | 1556 |
| Contract Governance | 5.8 | 6.3 | -0.5 | 1556 |
| Access Clarity | 26 | 26.5 | -0.5 | 1556 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.6 | 23.2 | -1.6 | 1556 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.9 | 13.7 | -2.8 | 1556 |
| Contract Quality | 13.8 | 17.6 | -3.8 | 1556 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 14% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Shopify 83.9
- 2 Algolia 82.8
- 3 Brevo 81.7
- 4 Optimizely 80.8
- 5 Adobe 80.4
- 6 Mailchimp 79.2
- 7 Lightspeed Commerce 78.8
- 8 AfterShip 78.6
- 9 ActiveCampaign 77.6
- 10 Tabby 77.1
- 1 AnyAPI 70.8
- 2 Mollie 69.8
- 3 Cracked API 68.5
- 4 Algolia 66.5
- 5 Adobe 65
- 6 Amazon Selling Partner API 64.6
- 7 Bloomreach 63.7
- 8 Boom Ai 63.6
- 9 Goody 63.1
- 10 Cordial 62.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.