E-Commerce
E-CommerceE-commerceEcommerceeCommerceecommerce
Providers using this tag (1661)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 34 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 55 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 186 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 218 Limited public surface area
Emerging 516 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 576 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 76 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (318)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 65 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 110 Limited public surface area
Emerging 103 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (47)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “E-Commerce” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1496 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged E-Commerce, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 62.4 | 61.2 | +1.2 | 1496 |
| Access Clarity | 26.1 | 26.5 | -0.4 | 1496 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.4 | -0.5 | 1496 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22 | 23.4 | -1.4 | 1496 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.2 | 13.9 | -2.7 | 1496 |
| Contract Quality | 15.7 | 19.8 | -4.1 | 1496 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 10% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 13% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 96% | 96% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Shopify 90.2
- 2 Brevo 87.3
- 3 AfterShip 83.8
- 4 Lightspeed Commerce 83.7
- 5 Tabby 80.6
- 6 Boom Ai 79.9
- 7 Klaviyo 79.1
- 8 Adobe 78.5
- 9 Mailchimp 77.8
- 10 Optimizely 77.4
- 1 Mollie 69.8
- 2 Boom Ai 65.8
- 3 Bloomreach 63.7
- 4 Cordial 62.9
- 5 Appcharge 62.5
- 6 Cracked API 62
- 7 Algolia 61.5
- 8 Medusa 61.1
- 9 DataForSEO 60.4
- 10 Automattic 60.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.