Order
OrdersOrder
Providers using this tag (89)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (755)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 54 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 80 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 213 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 272 Limited public surface area
Emerging 120 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (609)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Order” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 609 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 89 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Order, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.6 | 17.2 | +24.4 | 89 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.2 | 23.2 | +17 | 89 |
| Discoverability | 68.9 | 57.9 | +11 | 89 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.8 | 13 | +9.8 | 89 |
| Contract Governance | 9.3 | 6.5 | +2.8 | 89 |
| Access Clarity | 26.1 | 23.9 | +2.2 | 89 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 11% | +14 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 16% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 BigCommerce 82.5
- 2 Square 78.1
- 3 Mirakl 72.7
- 4 Nash 61.5
- 5 Walmart 59.4
- 6 depop 58
- 7 Swell 56.7
- 8 OK Capsule 56.5
- 9 Xentral 54.1
- 10 WooCommerce 53.4
- 1 Amazon Selling Partner API 65.5
- 2 Square 62.8
- 3 BigCommerce 60.5
- 4 Walmart 57.3
- 5 Mirakl 55.2
- 6 OK Capsule 51.9
- 7 Wish 46.4
- 8 Xentral 45.6
- 9 Nash 41.8
- 10 depop 41.6
Coverage caveat. 75 of 89 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.