Invoices
InvoiceInvoices
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (391)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 44 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 84 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 114 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 103 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (357)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Invoices” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 357 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Invoices, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.2 | 18.6 | +27.6 | 27 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.2 | 24.5 | +11.7 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 68.8 | 59.1 | +9.7 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.9 | 13.2 | +6.7 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 36.7 | 30 | +6.7 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 13.9 | 9.7 | +4.2 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 18% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 13% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 1% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 74% | 36% | +38 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Perk 70.2
- 2 Spendesk 66.5
- 3 Workist 56.2
- 4 PayPal 54.9
- 5 Syntage 54.4
- 6 ParseForMe 52.5
- 7 Mindee 51.1
- 8 Temlavo 49.9
- 9 Veryfi 49.4
- 10 SAP Concur 42.3
- 1 MarginEdge 56.4
- 2 Spendesk 48.9
- 3 Paulibytes UG (haftungsbeschränkt) 44.8
- 4 Perk 37.4
- 5 PayPal 37.1
- 6 BitPay 36.6
- 7 ParseForMe 36.1
- 8 Temlavo 34.2
- 9 Syntage 33.8
- 10 Cryptomus 33.8
Coverage caveat. 18 of 27 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.