Invoicing
Providers using this tag (173)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 64 Limited public surface area
Emerging 38 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (62)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (32)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Invoicing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
173 providers carry this tag directly, and 188 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 15 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 171 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Invoicing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 34.2 | 17.6 | +16.6 | 171 |
| Access Clarity | 40.4 | 26.5 | +13.9 | 171 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.4 | 23.2 | +13.2 | 171 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.5 | 13.7 | +10.8 | 171 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 58.1 | +7.5 | 171 |
| Contract Governance | 7.9 | 6.3 | +1.6 | 171 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 22% | 14% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 12% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 11% | +14 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Square 75.4
- 2 Stax 72.4
- 3 Tradeshift 64.7
- 4 Visma 64.2
- 5 Resolve 63.7
- 6 Agave 61.3
- 7 Slash 61
- 8 Lili 60.8
- 9 Solvimon 60.7
- 10 FieldPulse 59.3
- 1 Resolve 62.1
- 2 Mavenlink 61.3
- 3 Square 60.6
- 4 Tabs 60.2
- 5 Cobot 58
- 6 MonetizeNow 55.1
- 7 Stax 52.3
- 8 Xero 51.8
- 9 Tradeshift 50.9
- 10 Rillet 50.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.