Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Billing, Subscriptions and Monetization

Platform + register market (chargebee marketplace, recurly partners; stripe partner directory). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

53providers measured
26 (49.1%)declare their own
0 (0.0%)covered by others only
1 (1.9%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
26 (49.1%)undeclared
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-19 from the 53 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Chargebee 51.8 29 19 / 10 0 2 5 partner-built 66%, ipaas-bridge 17%, covered 3%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 7%

builds-on 12 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Amberflo 44.1 3 0 / 3 0 1 0 builds-on-platform 67%, distribution 33%
ChartMogul 38.8 12 0 / 12 0 0 5 ipaas-bridge 42%, standard 8%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 33%
Schematic 34.5 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%
Recurly 31.0 19 0 / 19 13 0 5 ipaas-bridge 26%, builds-on-platform 5%, unknown 68%
Churnkey 29.6 4 0 / 4 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 50%, builds-on-platform 50%
Invoiced 27.2 9 0 / 9 0 0 5 ipaas-bridge 56%, standard 11%, builds-on-platform 33%
Orb 22.2 3 0 / 3 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 67%, builds-on-platform 33%
Metronome 19.7 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 50%, builds-on-platform 50%
DealHub 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%
Dodo Payments 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%
Skio 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%
Paddle 16.3 5 0 / 5 0 0 4 ipaas-bridge 80%, builds-on-platform 20%

mixed 4 · no single mode dominates

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Maxio 38.1 3 0 / 3 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 33%, standard 33%, covered 33%
Stigg 37.0 3 0 / 3 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 33%, standard 33%, builds-on-platform 33%
RevenueCat 34.4 5 0 / 5 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 40%, standard 20%, covered 20%, builds-on-platform 20%
Zuora 33.2 6 0 / 6 0 1 2 ipaas-bridge 33%, standard 17%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 17%

long-tail 9 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Suger 12.1 thin 2 0 / 2 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 50%, distribution 50%
Recharge 5.5 35 0 / 35 0 0 31 ipaas-bridge 100%
Lago 5.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 100%
Ordway 5.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 100%
Paigo 5.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 100%
Polar 5.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 2 ipaas-bridge 100%
Cacheflow 2.5 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 100%
Ordergroove 2.5 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 100%
Subbly 2.5 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 100%

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Paid 19.2 thin 2 0 / 2 0 2 0 distribution 100%

undeclared 26 · declares nothing we can read: no number

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Apttus undeclared-----
Aqueduct undeclared-----
Ariasystems5d5a undeclared-----
Butterpayments undeclared-----
Creem undeclared-----
FastSpring undeclared-----
Hyperline undeclared-----
M3ter undeclared-----
MonetizeNow undeclared-----
Octane undeclared-----
OpenMeter undeclared-----
Outpost undeclared-----
PayPro Global undeclared-----
PriceOps undeclared-----
Receeve undeclared-----
RecVue undeclared-----
SAP BRIM (Billing and Revenue Innovation Management) undeclared-----
Sequence undeclared-----
Smartrr undeclared-----
Solvimon undeclared-----
Tabs undeclared-----
Togai undeclared-----
Touchmark undeclared-----
Vindicia undeclared-----
Zenskar undeclared-----
ZeroSettle undeclared-----

Generated 2026-10-19 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.