emerging · -2.0 market domain

Time Tracking

Score 23.5 / 100 71 providers +12 via APIs 29 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Human Capital Management 4

Providers using this tag (71)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
PracticePantherLegalLaw Practice ManagementCase ManagementBilling1 API37.5PlandayCompanySoftware-as-a-ServiceWorkforce ManagementScheduling1 API36.6Workday Tracking SystemAbsence ManagementAttendanceEnterpriseHCM13 APIs36.1BambooHRHuman ResourcesHRISPayroll1 API35.3Teamwork.comProject ManagementClient ServicesTask Management1 API33.9HubstaffTimesheetsWorkforce ManagementProductivity1 API32.1ClockifyTimesheetsProductivityProject Management1 API31.9FreshBooksAccountingInvoicingExpense Tracking1 API31.2EverhourTimesheetsProductivityProject Management1 API30.7HiveProject ManagementTask ManagementTeam CollaborationProductivity1 API28.0TimeCampTimesheetsProductivityAttendance1 API27.8PersonioHuman ResourcesHRISRecruitingApplicant Tracking1 API27.7AcceloProfessional Services AutomationProject ManagementCRM1 API27.2When I WorkEmployee SchedulingWorkforce ManagementTime Clock1 API38.6forecastCompanyProject ManagementResource ManagementProfessional Services Automation1 API37.9SmokeballLegalLaw FirmsPractice ManagementMatter1 API37.2CORCompanyAgency ManagementProject Management2 APIs36.5Nova LimaCompanyProject ManagementTask ManagementWork Management1 API35.6MyCaseBillingCalendaringCase ManagementClient Portal1 API35.0TimeularCompanyProductivityTime Management11 APIs34.3HakunaCompanyHuman ResourcesWorkforce Management1 API33.4Toggl TrackProductivityProject ManagementBilling1 API31.6PaylocityHuman ResourcesPayrollHCMBenefits1 API30.5Kanban ToolAgileBoardsKanbanProject Management12 APIs29.7MosaicResource ManagementWorkforce PlanningProject ManagementAEC1 API29.0RepliconCompanyEnterprise SoftwareTimesheets1 API27.3BonsaiCompanyB2BBusiness ManagementFreelancing26.6RakenConstructionConstruction ManagementDaily ReportingField Management1 API26.6Sesame HRHuman ResourcesHRISWorkforce Management1 API26.2
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (29)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (12)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Time Tracking” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Atlassian Hubflo Jira Leapsome Microsoft Dynamics 365 Oyster HR Reonic Rippling ServiceTitan Workable Workday Studio Zoho

Score breakdown

Frequency
55.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
33.8
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
16.8
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Project Management 34 co-occurrences Workforce Management 21 co-occurrences Timesheets 12 co-occurrences Time Off 11 co-occurrences Attendance 10 co-occurrences Payroll 24 co-occurrences Expenses 11 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag72
Api tag29
Openapi tag8
Openapi op tag31

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Time Tracking, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
71
all scored
Mean Kin Score
32.2
+10.0 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
22
+10 vs catalog 12
Spread
5.2–70.9
median 31.6 · σ 14.5
How the 71 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 4Developing 15Thin 29Emerging 17Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 32.9 17.2 +15.7 71
Developer Ergonomics 32.8 23.2 +9.6 71
Access Clarity 33.2 23.9 +9.3 71
Discoverability 65.7 57.9 +7.8 71
Operational Transparency 19.4 13 +6.4 71
Contract Governance 7.6 6.5 +1.1 71

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 24% 13% +11
MCP server (first-party) 23% 12% +11
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 24% 11% +13
Security 97% 98% -1
Arazzo workflows 6% 2% +4
Governance rules 21% 16% +5

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Clickup 70.9
  2. 2 Connecteam 62.9
  3. 3 Intuit 57.7
  4. 4 Rocketlane 55.6
  5. 5 Mavenlink 55.2
  6. 6 LeanLaw 54.1
  7. 7 Hourtick 53.4
  8. 8 Laurel 51.7
  9. 9 Teambridge 51.6
  10. 10 Clio 51
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Mavenlink 61.7
  2. 2 Clickup 57
  3. 3 TimeCamp 50.5
  4. 4 COR 48.8
  5. 5 Factorial 48.5
  6. 6 Nova Lima 46.4
  7. 7 Connecteam 44.5
  8. 8 LeanLaw 43.5
  9. 9 Sesame HR 42.4
  10. 10 Personio 41.8
All 71 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 59 of 71 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/time-tracking"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/time-tracking"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/time-tracking/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.