Project Management
Project ManagementProject-Managementproject-management
Providers using this tag (173)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 42 Limited public surface area
Emerging 43 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (59)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 173 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Project Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 32.7 | 17.5 | +15.2 | 173 |
| Access Clarity | 34.4 | 22.3 | +12.1 | 173 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.3 | 17.9 | +9.4 | 173 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.1 | 11.3 | +8.8 | 173 |
| Discoverability | 66.3 | 60.4 | +5.9 | 173 |
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.4 | +2.1 | 173 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 16% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 7% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 9% | +12 |
| Security | 90% | 88% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 13% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe Workfront 66.6
- 2 Asana 66.5
- 3 GitLab 65.3
- 4 ServiceNow 64.8
- 5 Slack 62.3
- 6 Erxes 62.2
- 7 LeanKit 62
- 8 SE Ranking 61.6
- 9 Autodesk 60.2
- 10 Shortcut Software 60.1
- 1 Adobe Workfront 62.9
- 2 Knak 58.8
- 3 Poggio Labs 54.5
- 4 Jira 52.9
- 5 Shortcut Software 52
- 6 GitLab 47.8
- 7 Nova Lima 46.4
- 8 Hubflo 44.4
- 9 Autodesk 43.2
- 10 LeanKit 41.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/project-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/project-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/project-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.