Project Management
Project Managementproject management
Providers using this tag (149)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 34 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (58)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (24)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Project Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 132 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Project Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.8 | 19.8 | +14 | 132 |
| Access Clarity | 38.3 | 26.5 | +11.8 | 132 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.6 | 13.9 | +9.7 | 132 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.8 | 23.4 | +9.4 | 132 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 61.2 | +4.5 | 132 |
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.4 | -0.1 | 132 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Jira 68.5
- 2 Azure DevOps 67.4
- 3 Adobe Workfront 66.9
- 4 Asana 66.6
- 5 Capsule 62.8
- 6 Erxes 62.7
- 7 Intuit 62.7
- 8 Taskfolk 61.1
- 9 LeanKit 60.9
- 10 Agave 60.5
- 1 Taskfolk 69.2
- 2 Adobe Workfront 60.8
- 3 Jira 56.6
- 4 Shortcut Software 52
- 5 Mavenlink 51.5
- 6 Nova Lima 46.4
- 7 Hubflo 44.4
- 8 LeanKit 42.9
- 9 Agave 42.5
- 10 TimeCamp 40.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.