Construction Technology
Providers using this tag (64)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 57 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Construction Technology, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 56 | 58.1 | -2.1 | 57 |
| Contract Governance | 3.2 | 6.3 | -3.1 | 57 |
| Access Clarity | 21.1 | 26.5 | -5.4 | 57 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.7 | 13.7 | -7 | 57 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.7 | 23.2 | -8.5 | 57 |
| Contract Quality | 7.3 | 17.6 | -10.3 | 57 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 14% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Fieldwire 56.2
- 2 SewerAI 56
- 3 Terabase Energy 53.1
- 4 Finalcad 51.5
- 5 Koppla 43.9
- 6 Rhumbix 40.1
- 7 Buildingconnected 34
- 8 Alloovium 31.9
- 9 Bridgit 30.5
- 10 Navigate 30
- 1 Terabase Energy 58.9
- 2 Finalcad 35.7
- 3 Alloovium 25
- 4 SewerAI 23.5
- 5 Rhumbix 22.1
- 6 Bridgit 21.5
- 7 Fieldwire 20.9
- 8 Navigate 18.1
- 9 Koppla 17.1
- 10 EquipmentShare 16
Coverage caveat. 55 of 57 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.