Collaboration
Collaborationcollaboration
Providers using this tag (226)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 21 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 51 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 47 Limited public surface area
Emerging 51 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 38 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (36)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Collaboration” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 198 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Collaboration, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33 | 19.8 | +13.2 | 198 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36 | 23.4 | +12.6 | 198 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 26.5 | +9.9 | 198 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.7 | 14 | +7.7 | 198 |
| Discoverability | 66.1 | 61.2 | +4.9 | 198 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.4 | +2.7 | 198 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 10% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 13% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 93% | 97% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 72.5
- 2 Fireflies.ai 70.3
- 3 Confluence 67.8
- 4 Canva 67.1
- 5 Adobe Workfront 66.9
- 6 Asana 66.6
- 7 Atlassian 65.6
- 8 Slack 65.6
- 9 GoToWebinar 64.9
- 10 Microsoft Graph 64.1
- 1 Taskfolk 69.2
- 2 Adobe Workfront 60.8
- 3 Fireflies.ai 60.4
- 4 Read AI 53.6
- 5 Coda Project 53.3
- 6 Notion 52.3
- 7 Canva 52.2
- 8 Box 52.1
- 9 Confluence 51.6
- 10 Figma 51.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.