Small Business
SMBSmall and Medium BusinessSMESMEsSMB SoftwareSmall Business
Providers using this tag (362)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 28 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 45 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 66 Limited public surface area
Emerging 125 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 89 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (49)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (36)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Small Business” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Accounting and Finance Ops | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 333 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Small Business, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 40.8 | 30 | +10.8 | 333 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.2 | 24.5 | +1.7 | 333 |
| Discoverability | 60.5 | 59.1 | +1.4 | 333 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.4 | 13.2 | +0.2 | 333 |
| Contract Quality | 18 | 18.6 | -0.6 | 333 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 9.7 | -0.6 | 333 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 18% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 16% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 34% | 36% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Xero 87.1
- 2 Vendasta 77.4
- 3 Act! CRM 73.7
- 4 Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central 73.1
- 5 AWeber 71.7
- 6 Connections 71.4
- 7 Intuit 70.8
- 8 Lili 68.7
- 9 FlowAccount 68.2
- 10 The Mobile First Company 65.4
- 1 KaiCalls 65
- 2 Xero 61.3
- 3 Connections 59.9
- 4 Asaas 59.7
- 5 AuraVMS 57.3
- 6 The Mobile First Company 54.5
- 7 Frontlatch 54.3
- 8 HEDGR 52.5
- 9 Salla 52.3
- 10 Debriefing 52.2
Coverage caveat. 274 of 333 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.