PSD2
Providers using this tag (81)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (54)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (12)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “PSD2” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 81 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged PSD2, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 42.9 | 19.8 | +23.1 | 81 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.4 | 23.4 | +20 | 81 |
| Discoverability | 72.5 | 61.2 | +11.3 | 81 |
| Access Clarity | 33.7 | 26.5 | +7.2 | 81 |
| Contract Governance | 10.1 | 6.4 | +3.7 | 81 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.2 | 14 | +3.2 | 81 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 13% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 57% | 11% | +46 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Klarna 76.3
- 2 Memo Bank 66.4
- 3 Tink 65.2
- 4 Barclays 62
- 5 Wealth Reader 61.4
- 6 iBanFirst 58.8
- 7 Genome 57.5
- 8 Fintecture 56.3
- 9 Algbra 55.4
- 10 Kontomatik 55
- 1 iBanFirst 55.1
- 2 Allica Bank 50.2
- 3 Memo Bank 47.2
- 4 Klarna 46.5
- 5 Barclays 46.5
- 6 Yorkshire Building Society 46.2
- 7 Bank of Ireland (UK) 45.1
- 8 NatWest Group 45.1
- 9 Lloyds Banking Group 41.9
- 10 Aldermore Bank 40.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.