Nordic Financial Registers (Swedish and Norwegian licence registers)

Where this market publishes its structure

• Finansinspektionen company register (fi.se/en/our-registers/company-register/, CSV export per main category) machine-readable, 225 licensed firms kept (banks, credit-market, consumer / mortgage credit, payment, e-money); no website column; 9 linked (LEI/name Wikidata P856, 3 hand-verified)
• Finanstilsynet registry (finanstilsynet.no/en/finanstilsynets-registry/; /api/virkereg/en/reports public JSON) machine-readable, licensed banks, payment / e-money / credit / finance companies, AIS providers: 166 licensed firms + 41 foreign branches (held); no website field; 0 linked (no Norwegian institution in the catalog); foreign branches held
• Danish FSA virksomhedsregister (virksomhedsregister.finanstilsynet.dk) not machine-readable: site's own /api/search/Typeahead and /api/Sitemap/Get answer 404; the list extract is a TARGIT Anywhere embed opened with a per-load session uid (embedded access token); not passed
• Finansinspektionen / Finanstilsynet CASP listings machine-readable, not re-read: Nordic CASPs are in ESMA's interim MiCA register read by the crypto market; its edges count as they stand

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 22 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

regulated 9 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

standard 2 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

mixed 1 · no single mode dominates

long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

undeclared 8 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 10; bridges: 0.